CRISPR ALERT: Safety fears over revolutionary gene-editing tool Crispr/Cas9 | Daily Mail Online

Safety fears over revolutionary gene-editing tool Crispr/Cas9

Safety fears have been raised over a revolutionary gene-editing tool hailed as one of the greatest innovations of medicine in recent decades.

Scientists have warned the genetic damage caused by the Crispr/Cas9 technology – known as Crispr – have been ‘seriously underestimated before now’.

They have uncovered evidence the gene-editing tool causes unwanted mutations that may prove dangerous – and is ‘much less safe’ than once thought.

 

Read more “CRISPR ALERT: Safety fears over revolutionary gene-editing tool Crispr/Cas9 | Daily Mail Online”

WATER STOLEN – Mexico quietly hands its water supply over to transnationals | Green Left Weekly

 

 

Mexico quietly hands its water supply over to transnationals

While many in Mexico are distracted by World Cup matches and the upcoming presidential elections, something big and strange has been going on under the radar.

Earlier this month, President Enrique Peña Nieto signed 10 decrees that essentially give transnationals like Coca-Cola and mining companies even greater access to the country’s water supply.

But there was little in the news about it. The media framed the measures as “guaranteeing water (supplies) for the next 50 years”. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) also got behind the decrees, under the pretence that they protect the environment.

After academics and water rights activists analysed the legal content of what had been passed and declared their opposition, the WWF again defended the measures. It claimed the “water reserves don’t represent in any way the privatisation of a resource, nor the extinguishing of any right to use water. Rather, [the decrees] clearly establish volumes of water that should be intact for biodiversity.”

WWF greenwashing

But the WWF is not impartial in Mexico, given its alliance with Mexico’s top billionaire Carlos Slim. Author Wilfried Huismann denounced the WWF saying it has been “selling its soul” and “greenwashing” business operations for companies such as Coca-Cola, Shell, Monsanto, HSBC, Cargill, BP, Alcoa and Marine Harvest.

“WWF is a willing service provider to the giants of the food and energy sectors, supplying industry with a green, progressive image … On the one hand it protects the forest; on the other it helps corporations lay claim to land not previously in their grasp. WWF helps sell the idea of voluntary resettlement to indigenous peoples,” said Huismann.

An analysis by Water for All, a Mexican grassroots organisation that campaigns for water rights, found that the recent decrees allow the government to guarantee water for mining, petroleum and private companies, at the expense of rural workers, indigenous groups and urban communities. The decrees lift a prohibition on extracting water from about 300 catchment areas.

They also declare that any water rights that have not been renewed are now invalid – meaning 50,000 towns, common land holders and communities, not realising they had to renew their right to access the water on their own land, have lost that right.

Furthermore, for the next 50 years, some states will be in charge of distributing water for public urban use through concessions. As seen in Puebla already, these concessions are essentially a privatisation of water, putting its management into the hands of corporations through a bidding process.

The Puebla government was the first state to successfully award a 60-year deal to a consortium to manage the local water. That consortium is run by corrupt business owners and money launderers — and as a result of the privatisation we have seen our water bills rise to 13 times what nearby states pay.

The company, Waters of Puebla, surprises residents with random water bill debts; refuses to fix broken connections while still charging water rates; restricts water access to some suburbs, seeing them go without water for months; and limits water to most poorer areas to just 60 minutes a week, while providing unlimited supply to wealthier suburbs and businesses such as Walmart.

In response to the WWF’s claim that the decrees have environmental goals, Water for All pointed out that the water the decrees reserve for conservation is expressed in millions of cubic metres a year, but “protecting rivers, catchment areas and their ecosystems depends more on regulating the water flow”.

Megaprojects

The decrees also come in a context of expanding “megaprojects” in the country. Huge construction, energy and mining projects are carried out at the expense of rural and indigenous communities, and the environment.

With the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994, extractive industries took off in Mexico. Mexican researchers have warned that 70% of the country’s rivers are already “seriously contaminated” by extractive industry. Indigenous and rural communities suffer, as their only water sources are flooded with toxic chemicals. Already, of the 731 drainage basins, 104 are undersupplied due to overuse.

In response to Water for All’s analysis, Mexico’s private media has published several articles calling the claims of privatisation “fake news”. “The privatisation of water is false,” stated one article, while another was headlined “Peña Nieto privatising the water is more fake news”.

The coverage seems to be a clean-up campaign by the private media to quickly reframe the conversation.

Ultimately, none of these articles dispute that the decrees were passed; instead they discuss whether it is correct to label the removal of prohibitions and the concessions to private companies as “privatisation”.

The timing of the decrees is no coincidence. Left-wing candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (commonly referred to as AMLO) is highly likely to win the July 1 presidential election, but he will not be sworn in until December 1. That gives the national and state governments a few months to award irreversible decades-long contracts and permits to corporations.

[Tamara Pearson has been an activist and journalist for 17 years, writing and fighting from Australia, Bolivia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and now Mexico. She blogs at Resistance Words, and is the author of The Butterfly Prison.]

 

CHINA’S BELT and ROAD INITIATIVE and WHY the EU criticises China’s “Silk Road”, and proposes its own alternative – Trends – GCR

CHINA’S BELT and ROAD INITIATIVE and WHY the EU criticises China’s “Silk Road”, and proposes its own alternative – Trends – GCR

 

EU criticises China’s “Silk Road”, and proposes its own alternative

The Belt & Road Initiative envisions six infrastructure and economic corridors running through some 65 countries, connecting China to the west (Wikimedia Commons)

9 May 2018 | By Rod Sweet 3 Comments

Unhappy with China’s growing dominance in Asia, Africa and eastern Europe through infrastructure development, the European Union (EU) has criticised China’s Belt & Road Initiative (BRI), and has launched a plan of its own to connect Europe with the east.

Twenty-seven of 28 EU national ambassadors last month signed a report criticising the vast Chinese initiative for benefitting Chinese companies and Chinese interests, and for undermining principles of free trade through its lack of transparency in procurement.

The BRI, also known as the “new Silk Road”, was unveiled by Chinese President Xi Xinping in 2013. It envisions six infrastructure and economic corridors running through some 65 countries to expedite China’s trade with the west.

The ambassadors said BRI “runs counter to the EU agenda for liberalising trade and pushes the balance of power in favour of subsidised Chinese companies,” reported German newspaper Handelsblatt, which saw the document.

Hungary’s ambassador to the EU was alone in not signing it.

Hungary was the first European country to sign up to the BRI, in 2015, and has been in conflict with the EU over its plans for a Chinese-built and financed railway between its capital Budapest and the Serbian capital, Belgrade.

China’s influence has also extended recently to Croatia, an EU member. Its government has awarded the contract to build the 2.4km-long Peljesac bridge to a Chinese consortium, sparking a legal challenge by Austrian contractor Strabag, which claimed the Chinese bid was suspiciously low.

The ambassadors’ report, which Handelsblatt characterised as “unusually biting”, was compiled ahead of an EU-China summit in July. The European Commission, the EU’s executive body, is trying to forge a common EU stance on the BRI, the newspaper said.

Chinese infrastructure diplomacy typically involves loans to governments for major infrastructure projects, conditional upon one of China’s large state-owned construction companies carrying out the work. “This bilateral structure leads to an unequal distribution of power which China exploits,” the ambassadors’ report said.

“At the same time the initiative is pursuing domestic political goals like the reduction of surplus capacity, the creation of new export markets and safeguarding access to raw materials,” said the report.

Ambassadors warned that European companies would be excluded from BRI contracts without European principles of transparency in public procurement, as well as environmental and social standards.

The German government has been particularly critical of the BRI. A study it released in February with German chambers of commerce concluded that BRI projects took place most often in politically unstable countries with weak legal frameworks, reported Handelsblatt.

A plan of its own

Meanwhile, the EU has begun formulating a plan of its own to build infrastructure links to Asia.

The European Commission released a consultation document in February soliciting opinion on “an EU Strategy on Connecting Europe and Asia”, which is expected to become official EU policy by October.

It notes an Asian Development Bank estimate that Asia needs $26 trillion in infrastructure investment between now and 2030.
Without mentioning China, the document worries about “the proliferation of bilateral initiatives” which have “raised concerns about environmental, social, and fiscal sustainability and have at times contributed to state fragility in the Euro-Asian region”.

Separately, the International Monetary Fund’s managing director Christine Lagarde warned last month that BRI projects risked saddling developing countries with unsustainable debt.

The EU wants its Asia connectivity plan to have sustainable financing and to increase the resilience of countries involved, as well as providing opportunities for European companies to participate.

It is meant to give developing countries an alternative to China’s BRI, said Frans-Paul van der Putten, a senior research fellow at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

“The EU is unhappy that many countries in Asia and eastern Europe seem to regard China as the main source of investment in greater regional integration, whereas in the view of the EU it is itself a much larger actor in this regard,” he told the South China Morning Post.

Image: The Belt & Road Initiative (also known as the “new Silk Road”) envisions six infrastructure and economic corridors, running through some 65 countries, connecting China to the west (Wikimedia Commons)

 

GENOCIDE – SERCO’s Covert Network of Companies Engages in Software and Poison Programs . . . maps/graphs

GENOCIDE – SERCO’s Covert Network of Companies Engages in Software and Poison Programs . .

http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/06/serco-ses-wet-ware

https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/11/tentacles-of-serco-strangle-america/comment-page-1

Summary: Open Genocide the London-NY-Axis by SERCO

Serco Group is a crown-controlled company conspiring with the Senior Executive Service (SES) to implement a soft-kill program to depopulate the world for the London-NY-Axis (the English monarch, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild) through:

Eugenics, the world-intelligence-network, software and poison programs). On 2 Jan 2018, Serco was awarded a 610 million USD contract to manage FEMA Region IX that covers California, Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. On 16 Jul 2013, Obama awarded Serco a 1.2 billion USD contract to run the ObamaCare website. Serco also manages the air-traffic-control towers in 63 US airports, and has been paid more than 95 million USD to run the US patent and trademark examination processes. Serco has 73 subsidiaries and runs the “Internet of Things” patents filed by Richard C Walker, Hewlett-Packard and Agilent Technologies (these patents explicitly refer to human beings as “wet-ware”). Serco’s activities are correlated with DOJ 500 (500 unelected DOJ lawyers), OPIC, MCC, USAID, Serco Inc, the Aerospace Corporation, crown-agents, the Office of Net Assessment (DoD), Andrew W Marshall, the American Inns of Court, the Five Eyes (5is = US, GB, CA, AU, NZ), the Internet of Things, the Highlands Group, the IBM Eclipse Foundation, the theft of social networking invention created by Leader Technologies, James P Chandler III and Richard C Walker’s “wet-ware” patents.

This system, called SERCO, is widely known and many researchers and authors precede us in their reporting; however, it is our intent in this series of articles and videos to show the specific rat lines that make Senior Executive Services and SERCO the evilest system in the world. We will be showing you the big picture of SERCO in this series.

TOXIC WATER ALERT: Public water in Washington, D.C., was declared unsafe to drink; warnings issued to the public – NaturalNews.com

TOXIC WATER ALERT:  Public water in Washington, D.C., was declared unsafe to drink; warnings issued to the public –NaturalNews.com

Posted on StopTheCrime.net

Public water in Washington, D.C., was declared unsafe to drink; warnings issued to the public 7/17/18

Image: Public water in Washington, D.C., was declared unsafe to drink; warnings issued to the public

(Natural News) Many Washington, D.C., residents spent the weekend under a boil water advisory due to a contamination risk. On Friday, DC Water began advising tens of thousands of homes and businesses across a big area of Northeast and Northwest D.C. to boil their tap water before drinking or cooking with it.

Around 34,000 people were affected by the problem initially, although the actual number could be much higher because, for example, all of the residents in an apartment complex are often counted as just one customer.

The issue stemmed from a problem with the city’s water system that allowed contaminants to get into the water in the affected areas. The source was an open valve at the Bryant Street pumping station, which is situated to the east of Howard University.

After detecting a drop in water pressure at around 8:30 p.m. on Thursday evening, the emergency alert was issued at 4:35 a.m. on Friday morning. The area covered by the boil water advisory was reduced just after noon on Friday. However, a new area of land near the border with Maryland was added to the advisory.

Experts weren’t initially sure if any water had been contaminated, but they put the advisory in place as a precaution. Although the water was safe to use for bathing, customers were advised to use boiled or bottled water for purposes such as preparing food, feeding pets, drinking, making ice, brushing teeth, and preparing baby formula.Those who accidentally ingested the water need to look out for digestive issues. One area out of 13 tested positive for contamination with total coliform bacteria, but it has since been cleared. Washington, D.C., officials also closed all of the pools, water fountains and spray parks in the areas affected, despite temperatures reaching into the 80s. Bottled water was delivered to those living in area homeless shelters.

100% organic essential oil sets now available�for your home and personal care, including Rosemary, Oregano, Eucalyptus, Tea Tree, Clary Sage and more, all 100% organic and laboratory tested for safety. A multitude of uses, from stress reduction to topical first aid. See the complete listing here, and help support this news site.�

Was the boil water advisory handled poorly by authorities?

Some residents were outraged that they only learned about the problem through the news and social media instead of being informed directly by the government or DC Water. The general manager of DC Water, David Gadis, insisted that the utility did everything it could to reach customers using methods like email and robo calls.

Washington, D.C.’s Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency warned residents of the advisory through Twitter and its Alert DC system. However, only those who sign up for these alerts will receive them, so many people simply didn’t get the word that their water was unfit for consumption.

The alert was lifted on Sunday, but residents were warned to run cold water through the taps for 10 minutes before getting back to their usual water usage.

Cities across America covering up crumbling water infrastructure instead of fixing it

Although this problem was reportedly caused by a valve issue, crumbling infrastructure in aging water delivery systems remains a huge problem throughout the nation. When water passes through corroding iron pipes, it can become contaminated with rust. These pipes can also rupture, allowing diseases and pollutants from the ground to get inside the water supply. Many waterborne disease outbreaks can be attributed to distribution system problems.

Across the nation, municipalities spend in excess of $50 million every year to bring residents “clean” drinking water. However, some experts say there is little point in cleaning up water but then delivering it to people using dirty pipes. The cost of replacing aging pipelines around the country in the decades to come could cost water utility companies hundreds of billions of dollars.

This is why people who care about their health avoid drinking tap water, regardless of how clean their municipality says it is. Aging infrastructure, the addition of fluoride, and possible contamination are just some of the issues that are driving people to increasingly turn to gravity water filters so they can feel confident that the water they are drinking is safe and clean.

FOSSIL FUEL ENDING: Rockefellers to switch investments to ‘clean energy’ – BBC News

COMMENT:
 
Total Disruption is about to occur with the discontinued use of gas driven cars, trucks, buses, farm equipment, gas powered tools, and everything else gas.  Kiss your gas Good Bye!
 
Our petroleum was NEVER a fossil fuel which NEVER came from dead dinosaurs or plant material, but does that really matter?  Those with the money are changing civilization as we have know it and leading all of us into
chaos, financial ruin, and stealing resources that will disrupt our ability to live . . .
                                
 

 

Rockefellers to switch investments to ‘clean energy’ 9/23/2014

Media captionValerie Rockefeller Wayne, chair of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, spoke to the BBC about the decisionHeirs to the Rockefeller family, which made its vast fortune from oil, are to sell investments in fossil fuels and reinvest in clean energy, reports say.

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund is joining a coalition of philanthropists pledging to rid themselves of more than $50bn (£31bn) in fossil fuel assets.

The announcement was made on Monday, a day before the UN climate change summit opens on Tuesday.

Some 650 individuals and 180 institutions have joined the coalition.

It is part of a growing global initiative called Global Divest-Invest, which began on university campuses several years ago, the New York Times reports.

Pledges from pension funds, religious groups and big universities have reportedly doubled since the start of 2014.

UN summit

Rockefeller Brothers Fund director Stephen Heintz said the move to divest from fossil fuels would be in line with oil tycoon John D Rockefeller’s wishes,

“We are quite convinced that if he were alive today, as an astute businessman looking out to the future, he would be moving out of fossil fuels and investing in clean, renewable energy,” Mr Heintz said in a statement.

A general view shows the plenary session at the Bella Center of Copenhagen on 19 December 2009 at the end of the COP15 UN Climate Change Conference. Image copyright Getty Images Image caption The last major conference on climate change, in Copenhagen in 2009, ended without resultsThe philanthropic organisation was founded in 1940 by the sons of John D Rockefeller. As of 31 July 2014, the fund’s investment assets were worth $860m.

“There is a moral imperative to preserve a healthy planet,” Valerie Rockefeller Wayne, a great-great-granddaughter of Mr Rockefeller and a trustee of the fund, is quoted by the Washington Post as saying.

A climate change summit is due to start on Tuesday at the UN headquarters in New York, with 125 heads of state and government members expected to attend.

It is the first such gathering since the unsuccessful climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009.


At the scene: Matt McGrath, Environment Correspondent, BBC News

The event held to launch the Rockefellers’ news was more revivalist meeting than press conference. There was whooping, cheering, hollering and stamping of feet.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu appeared by video and told the assembly that the move was “a tipping point of transition to a new energy economy that was just and equitable”.

Rockefeller Brothers Fund director Stephen Heintz said dryly that “everyone noted the irony” that a foundation built on oil wealth would now be leading the charge out of fossil fuel.

Actor Mark Ruffalo, who also signed the pledge, told the conference: “These are not silly people, these are people who know how to deal with money.”

They recognised that clean energy was “the future”, he said – prompting more whooping, cheering and stamping of feet.


UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon hopes leaders can make progress on a universal climate agreement to be signed by all nations at the end of 2015.

On Sunday, hundreds of thousands of marchers took to the streets in more than 2,000 locations worldwide, demanding urgent action on climate change and calling for curbs on carbon emissions.

Business leaders, environmentalists and celebrities also joined the demonstrations, which were organised by The People’s Climate March.

Media captionHuge crowds attended climate marches in New York and other cities around the world on Sunday

 

URBAN INFERNO FILM: Fellow Activists Needed – July 19 at 6 PM Santa Rosa

KNOW WHERE YOUR DONATIONS GO WHEN ATTENDING THIS PORTRAYAL OF A WEAPONIZED DELIBERATE ATTACK ON/IN SONOMA COUNTY and MULTIPLE COUNTIES THAT FATEFUL NIGHT OF OCTOBER 8, 2017.

DONATIONS GO TO – SONOMA COUNTY RESILIENCE FUND – COMMUNITY FOUNDATION . . .
THIS IS   R O C K E F E L L E R  and  R O T H S C H I L D scheme to fund their policies to reduce climate change aka reduce the population. . . These funds are used to implement Resilient City Adaptation using Google to create a wireless cyber cage where we do not survive . .
Please Listen to this YouTube Video – Kill Cities by Rothschild and Rockefeller . . .
Consider NOT donating to our continued demise!
Deborah
Activists Needed at Film Showing:
Urban Inferno – The Night That Santa Rosa Burned
The Roxy Theater
July 19, 2018 (Thursday)
6:00 p.m. thru 11 pm  There are two showings . . .
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Jwl Peace <jwlpeace@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 7:25 PM
Subject: Fellow Activists Needed This Thursday @ 6 pm – 11 pm, Santa Rosa
To: Jamie1 <jwlpeace@gmail.com>

Here is the You Tube i just made

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyKh-WWnszw

Trailer for Urban Inferno

 Note how they are combing URBAN with Forest Fires..hmmm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwHUC4Z8X8s

This Thursday the PTB’s are setting their propaganda about WHAT happened the first 12 hours. As many that can make it, we will be holding the laminated story lines (see attached) about HOW the fires started to help educate those going in and coming out of the movie theater.

 It will be civil, and passive and trying to educate any that wish to hear an alternate story from trees fell on PGE power lines that cause all the fires..

This movie focus’ on the Tubbs fire in Santa Rosa. Please join us so we can have numbers, all deserve to hear another narrative, especially those that have lost everything.

Jamie

<image.png>

Urban Inferno, the Night Santa Rosa Burned” is the latest documentary film from Santa Rosa’s Award Winning film-maker Dr. Stephen Seager, a local physician and psychiatrist. Dr. Seager was chased from his burning neighborhood “that terrible night”, and as he was fleeing with family and pets he declared that a documentary film MUST be made of this nightmare and it MUST be made by ”someone who lived it”.

Amaturo Sonoma Media President, Michael O’Shea, and Director Dr. Seager joined Pat Kerrigan on the KSRO Morning News to share their experiences when the fires first broke out, why Dr. Seager felt he needed to embark on telling our community’s story, as well as other facets of the production, including the upcoming premiere happening on Thursday, July 19th at the Roxy 14 Theater in downtown Santa Rosa:

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/entertainment/8518682-181/urban-inferno-locally-made-documentary?sba=AAS

‘Urban Inferno,’ locally made documentary on Tubbs fire, to premiere …

1 day ago – Urban Inferno” will premiere at 7 p.m. and 9 pm July 19 at Santa Rosa’s Roxy 14 Cinema, then move July 20 to the nearby Third Street Cinemas for an …

FIRE ALERT: Wildfires rage in Arctic Circle as Sweden calls for help . .

FIRE ALERT: Wildfires rage in Arctic Circle as Sweden calls for help
This just in from Sweden.
COMMENT DIRECT FROM SWEDEN:  interesting thing about  this is they have never been as widespread before.
Russia, Greenland, Sweden, FInland
 we had a ‘thunderstorm’ and electricity down yesterday. The forecast was sunny all day but the trails had been sprayed every morning since Saturday -the sky is now clearing and the temperatures are heading back up to 30C again by the weekend.
interesting apparently the last time it was like this was 1933 (what else happened in 1933?)
Water and food spring to mind.
Note how it is played as the government doesn’t have the means to manage the ‘burden on the people’ so is doing them a favour by ‘off-loading’ on to the private sector.
Bernays would be proud.

MIND CONTROL Technologies – Secret Meetings – and Murders – From 1992 . . .

MIND CONTROL Technologies – Secret Meetings – and Murders – From 1992 . . .

Note: This was the technology being released and was in current use in 1992. What is now used is incredibly advanced and best described as remote induction (soft-style) no voices heard but attitudes shaped in mass population very slowly and subtly except for controlled experiments like the DNC demonstrations of college students who leaders are paid and the followers are targeted with mass (soft) remote induction. Remote soft induction is now the norm, but voice to skull is periodically tested and deployed to see how effective it capabilities can be in selected unstable or mentally ill targets.

Phone calls can be totally morphed  or partially morphed or even single words changed to sound exactly the same as the speaker, all done by high speed quantum based A.I. logarithms. There is a lot more to all this now, depends on how much you want to know. This jives with the Comm 12 Briefing Report and the Finders docs referred to in the US News and World Report (USN controlled).

This is a program from a conference in 1992. I wish that none of it was true. This did not originate with me (please).scan0001 scan0002

WARNING: PG&E (Rothschild) and Elon Musk – Tesla team up on big batteries – SFChronicle.com

https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/PG-E-Tesla-team-up-on-big-batteries-13038571.php

An array of Tesla Powerpacks — the industrial-size batteries helping power a Hawaiian island and part of Australia — may soon plug in to a Pacific Gas and Electric Co. substation in Moss Landing (Monterey County).

PG&E asked state regulators Friday to approve four contracts for using big batteries to help support the electrical grid in several locations. The one in Moss Landing would be designed and built by Palo Alto’s Tesla, while PG&E would own and operate it. The other three projects would be owned and run by other companies.

PG&E asked the California Public Utilities Commission to vote on the contracts within 90 days.

PG&E, for example, plans to replace the output from such “peaker” plants in Oakland and San Jose with batteries and solar arrays. The commission ordered the state’s utilities in 2013 to procure 1.3 gigawatts of electricity storage capacity by 2020 — enough electricity to supply 993,750 typical homes at any given instant.

While best known for its luxury electric cars, Tesla offers batteries for both homes and businesses, and sees energy storage as a huge growth opportunity. One Tesla Powerpack system, paired with a 13-megawatt solar array, already supplies electricity after dark to the island of Kauai. The company installed another in 2017 in South Australia to help stabilize the grid after a string of blackouts.

Tesla and PG&E have already collaborated on a grid-tied battery project: a Powerpack installation with a capacity of 500 kilowatts that began operations last year at a PG&E substation in Yuba County, about 50 miles north of Sacramento.

The Moss Landing project would have a capacity of 182.5 megawatts, according to PG&E. The other battery contracts for which PG&E is now seeking approval include a 75-megawatt facility near Morgan Hill, a second Moss Landing facility with a capacity of 300 megawatts, and a collection of smaller, privately owned batteries in the South Bay that, together, have a capacity of 10 megawatts.