MISSING WOMEN Australian Indigenous women are “under” represented in missing persons statistics – Lost, Missing and/or Murdered . . .

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-08/australian-indigenous-women-are-overrepresented-missing-persons/11699974

Australian Indigenous women are overrepresented in missing persons statistics – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Lost, missing or murdered?

Some of the country’s most vulnerable people are going missing, and many are never found. In Canada they’re calling it a genocide, but in Australia some states aren’t even keeping count.

Exclusive by Isabella Higgins and Sarah Collard

Updated 

Published 

Sheena McBride could feel something was wrong. Her daughter Monique had not come home, she wasn’t replying to messages and her calls were going straight to voicemail.

Monique, 24, had left her sleepy hometown of Hervey Bay in regional Queensland on a Thursday for a weekend trip to Brisbane.

For the first two days she kept in touch. On the Saturday she told her mum she’d be back the next day.

Then contact stopped.

Sheena anxiously waited for her daughter to come home, or to call with an explanation about a broken phone.

But it never came.

“You just know that there’s something that’s gone terribly wrong. You feel it in your stomach,” she said.

“It’s like you’re in a nightmare, but you’re just sitting there awake.”

Sheena turned to police, and by Friday, her daughter, Monique Clubb, was officially a missing person.

“It just got more urgent as every day went by. I started to think this can’t be happening,” Monique’s brother Mickey Clubb said.

The painful days have continued and now more than six long years have passed.

The family’s initial panic has transformed into never-ending grief.

“You start to realise, maybe she’s not coming home,” Mickey said.

Police will often categorise a disappeared person, like Monique, as either “lost, missing or murdered”.

Lost will describe those who are temporarily disoriented.

Missing is for those who willingly left, or were forced to leave. And then there’s murdered.

Monique’s family don’t know what category she’s in.

And they are not the only Indigenous family asking the same question: is she lost, missing or murdered?

Australian authorities are yet to truly understand how many Aboriginal women are in these categories.

But for the first time — through exclusive data provided to the ABC — an insight into the extent of the problem can be seen.

In Western Australia, Aboriginal people make up 17.5 per cent of unsolved missing persons cases, despite making up just 3 per cent of the state’s population.

The state does not provide a gender breakdown of missing persons statistics.

Queensland and New South Wales police provided some data to the ABC that showed an over-representation of Indigenous missing persons.

In Queensland, police estimate 6 per cent of open, unsolved missing persons cases are Indigenous people.

In New South Wales, police provided data only to 2014. In that time Indigenous people made up 7 per cent of unsolved cases.

Also in NSW, 10 per cent of females not found since 2014 are Indigenous women, but they make up less than 3 per cent of the state’s population.

There is no national figure because many states are not counting the cases, or measuring the size of the problem, at all.

Where is Monique?

Monique’s life before her disappearance was complicated.

She attended the local Catholic school, was a good athlete and loved spending time with her friends.

As the second-oldest of six children in a close-knit Indigenous family, she often acted like “a second mum” when “times were tough,” according to her sister Minnie Clubb.

When Monique graduated, she got a job at the local tavern and was generous with her new-found income, often shouting her siblings meals.

But in the lead up to her disappearance, her family had concerns about the crowd she was spending time with — a crowd that was often getting in trouble with the law.

Monique began to accumulate a criminal record for thefts and court violations that eventually led to a short stint in jail.

In June 2013, she told her family about a trip to Brisbane with her new friends.

While they worried about her going away with this new group, they never imagined it would be the last time they saw her.

Now, she is a statistic — one of the 6 per cent of unsolved missing persons cases Queensland police guess involve Indigenous people.

Across Australia, about 40,000 people are reported missing in Australia each year, and 99 per cent will be brought home, usually within hours.

But like Monique, many aren’t.

Of those unsolved cases, some get more prominence than others — by the media, the public and police.

And Monique’s family can’t help but feel her past run-ins with the law and her Aboriginal heritage stifled her chance at justice.

“They weren’t really serious about finding her, not at all, I don’t reckon,” Sheena said.

“It’s been six years and we haven’t got answers from them.

“It should be justice for anyone, no matter their skin colour.”

A Queensland Police spokesperson insisted the case was “thoroughly investigated across several police districts”.

In the days following her disappearance, detectives re-traced Monique’s journey from Hervey Bay to Brisbane, uncovering CCTV vision of her exiting a train station at Beenleigh.

The police would not share this vision with the ABC.

Since the day she exited the train station, her bank accounts and phone have not been touched.

Queensland Police said the case remained open.

‘We’re invisible’

After years on the frontline of social services, Dorinda Cox, a former police officer-turned women’s advocate, is sounding the alarm.

Australia is one of the safest countries in the world, but Dorinda says Aboriginal women live in danger.

She says the country has failed to protect them — and it’s cost potentially thousands of Indigenous women and girls their life.

“We need to stop this senseless violence against Aboriginal women,” Dorinda said.

“Indigenous women in this country — we’re invisible,” she said.

Indigenous women who are reported missing are less likely to be found.

Many are presumed dead.

Like Amelia Hausia.

It was 1992 when Amelia was last seen at a Canberra shopping centre. She was 17 years old.

And like Rebecca Hayward.

It was New Years Day in 2017 when Rebecca’s family last saw her. She was 35 years old.

Veronica Lockyer and her baby daughter Adell have been missing for more than 21 years.

Only one known photograph of mother and baby, then seven months old, remains.

Where are Veronica and Adell?

Donna Lockyer is Veronica’s other daughter, but they were separated when Donna was two years old.

Now 24, she has spent 20 years wondering about her mother.

“There are times when I’ve broken down because I want nothing more than my mother and I don’t have that,” Donna said.

When we spoke to Donna, she was living in Perth, 280 kilometres from Merredin, the small town where her mother was last seen.

For two decades, there was confusion about where Veronica was living.

“My mother’s family thought she ran away with my father,” Donna said.

After trying to find Veronica, Donna realised she had not been seen and reported the disappearance.

Veronica and her baby became official missing persons in 2018.

Detectives said there was no evidence of the mother and baby existing beyond 1998.

“I’ve never seen her in person until the detective on my case gave me the photo … and I just burst out in tears,” Donna said.

As an advocate who sees the devastation these unsolved cases bring, Dorinda Cox believes the first step is calculating the number of lives lost across generations.

“[We need] to investigate why they’ve gone missing and where are they now,” Dorinda said.

“There are these unanswered questions, it just leaves tensions and anxiety in communities.”

To help her find answers, Dorinda looked overseas.

What she found was another country dealing with its own multi-generational crisis of lost Indigenous women.

Canada’s Indigenous ‘genocide’

For Lori Whiteman, the story of Veronica and Adell hits close to home.

She too has spent decades wondering if her mother is lost, missing or murdered.

Lori lives in Regina, Saskatchewan in Canada’s rural south and campaigns for Native Women’s rights.

Her mother, Delores ‘Lolly’ Whiteman, has been missing since 1987, and still there is no trace of what happened to her.

“Over many years, I went through obsessive cycles of searching, always thinking there has to be someone who knows something,” Lori said.

She said few in Canada’s Indigenous community have been unaffected by the staggering rates of violence targeting their women and girls.

“I also lost many other relatives from my reserve — Standing Buffalo,” Lori said.

“So many lost, too soon, too young. So much violence and sadness.”

After years of campaigning from Native American communities, the Canadian Government listened.

An almost-three-year inquiry investigated the rates of missing and murdered Aboriginal women and found the problem was extensive and devastating.

The inquiry’s final 1,300-page report, handed down this year, made 230 recommendations to address a crisis “centuries in the making”.

The report labelled the rate of missing and murdered Indigenous women as a “genocide”.

Other parts of the world are also starting to investigate the levels of violence faced by their Indigenous women.

In the United States, Donald Trump recently signed an executive order creating a White House taskforce on missing and murdered Indigenous women.

He said it was “sobering and heartbreaking” to hear of violence faced by Native American women.

Australian advocates believe the time has come for the nation to face the situation here.

“This is the unresolved grief, the oppression, the continued racism that is dividing this country, we need to take hold of that,” Dorinda said.

After meeting with the woman who drove the Canadian inquiry, she is calling on the Australian Government to launch an urgent probe into the rates of missing and murdered Indigenous women in this country.

“We have very, very similar systemic issues [to Canada],” Dorinda said.

“If we have an inquiry, we can actually start to interrogate this on a much more rigorous basis. We can actually find the answers.”

For the families who are still mourning the women they lost, an inquiry may come too late.

Monique Clubb’s family have reached their own grim conclusion: she was murdered.

Queensland Police said the case had been referred to the coroner, who could rule that Monique was legally dead.

“The hardest part is not being able to bury your daughter,” her mother Sheena said.

“Not being able to bring her home and have the closure and the truth come out.”

Donna Lockyer said there was “no help for Aboriginal women who go missing” and supported calls for a national inquiry.

She too has a theory about what happened to her mother and sister and next year the West Australian coroner will investigate the case.

While these families pray for closure, advocates like Dorinda say another family’s heartbreak can be prevented.

“Through an inquiry we can actually find a dedicated strategy and dedicate resources to make sure we tackle this problem,” she said.

“The oppression, the voiceless violence that is experienced by our women is a real travesty.”

If nothing changes, Aboriginal communities will continue to be torn apart by grief.

“Our lives matter to our children, to our families, to our communities to our society overall,” Dorinda said.

“We can fully prevent the missing circumstances of those women and their children.

“We as [Aboriginal women] need to become visible and start talking about why our lives matter.”

Credits:

Two images of Monique are laid out like a scrapbook.

Posted 

 

Executive Order 13834 – Toilet to Tap: Treating Municipal Wastewater and Reusing it for Drinking Water . . .

Water Efficiency – FedCenter

Executive Order (EO) 13834, Efficient Federal Operations, was signed by President … Section 2, of EO 13834 directs federal facilities to continue the following efforts: …. options, and to improve the energy performance of the Federal Government. …. and design, treating municipal wastewater and reusing it for drinking water, …

EO 13514 Goals

Consistent with State law, identify, promote, and implement water reuse strategies that reduce potable water consumption; and

EO 13423 established quantifiable water reduction requirements for Federal agencies and required that, beginning in FY 2008, Federal agencies must reduce water consumption intensity through life-cycle cost-effective measures relative to the baseline of the agency’s water consumption in FY 2007 by 2% annually through the end of FY 2015 or 16% by the end of FY 2015. EO 13514 extends the annual 2% reduction in water consumption intensity to 2020, thereby requiring a total reduction of 26%.

EO 13514 also establishes specific water reduction requirements for ILA water consumption and encourages the implementation of water reuse strategies

EO 13514 water efficiency and management goals support requirements contained in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA).

2.2 General Principles

When implementing the water efficiency and management goals of EO 13514, Federal agencies should pursue an “Efficiency First” approach, whereby they seek to reduce or eliminate water use wherever feasible by making the most efficient use of existing water sources and reducing use. Metering should be implemented wherever feasible to identify opportunities to reduce water use and enable tracking of reductions and associated benefits including cost savings.

The water use efficiency and management requirements of EO 13514 apply at the Agency level and agencies should focus on long-term reductions –

The DOE Guidance for the Implementation and Follow-up of Identified Energy and Water Efficiency Measures in Covered Facilities, can be found at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/eisa_project_guidance.pdf?CFID=2049309&CFTOKEN=1586545

ADVISORY – DEPLOYMENT of “Wireless” Smart Nodes a Military Weapons System

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?preview=true&m=1111839869613&ca=1c6375e4-49d0-4a67-8910-ea9ed60cadd3&id=preview

 

 

KISS YOUR FUEL GOOD BYE: The Navajo Generating Station Coal Plant Officially Powers Down. Will Renewables Replace It? | Greentech Media

https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/navajo-generating-station-coal-plant-closes-renewables?utm_medium=email&utm_source=GridEdge&utm_campaign=GTMGridEdge

The Navajo Generating Station Coal Plant Officially Powers Down. 

Will Renewables Replace It?

One of the nation’s largest coal plants permanently powered down this week after the owners determined it would be uneconomical to continue operating the facility as natural gas and renewable energy prices continue to drop.

The Navajo Generating Station (NGS) officially shut off at 12:09 p.m. on November 18 when long-time employee Fred Larson opened the Unit 2 breakers, according to the plant operator, Arizona utility Salt River Project (SRP).  The plant had been operating since the mid-1970s on land leased from the Navajo Nation, located east of Page, Arizona.

The closure raises questions about the future of SRP’s energy mix and the extent to which renewables will meet the utility’s energy needs. It also presents a new set of challenges and opportunities for the Navajo Nation, which hosted the coal plant for more than 40 years and relied on it for revenue. When the decision to close NGS was made two years ago, over 500 employees were working at the plant — more than 90 percent of whom are Navajo.

The head of SRP framed the closure as a difficult but necessary decision based on “shifting economics” within the energy industry.

“NGS will always be remembered as a coal-fired workhorse whose employees made it one of the safest and most reliable power plants in the nation,” said SRP CEO and General Manager Mike Hummel.

In 2017, the owners of NGS decided to shutter the 2,250-megawatt coal plant after its lease with the Navajo Nation was scheduled to expire in late December.

SALT RIVER PROJECT – SRP owns 42.9 percent of NGS, with another 24.3 percent owned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Other partial owners include Arizona Public Service, NV Energy and Tucson Electric Power.

Over the next three years, contractors will carry out demolition and reclamation duties at the NGS site as they have at many other coal plant sites across the country. The U.S. Energy Information Administration found that between 2010 and the first quarter of 2019, U.S. power companies announced the retirement of more than 546 coal-fired power units, totaling roughly 102 gigawatts of generating capacity. An additional 17 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity is expected to retire by 2025.

Natural gas and a massive solar-charged battery

According to an SRP spokesperson, the public power entity is primarily replacing its share of NGS’ generating capacity with natural gas from the Mesquite and Gila River power plants as well as some additional new solar resources.

Last week, ahead of the Navajo coal plant retirement, SRP announced the purchase of two new solar and battery storage plants, making it one of the largest investors in energy storage in the country.

The Sonoran Energy Center will comprise a 250-megawatt solar array coupled with a 1-gigawatt-hour energy storage system located in Arizona’s Little Rainbow Valley. The Storey Energy Center will be an approximately 88-megawatt solar and energy storage system, located south of Coolidge.

“These integrated solar and storage plants will allow SRP to meet its summer peak demand, reduce carbon emissions, and provide clean energy to our customers while optimizing energy output using state-of-the-art battery technology,” Hummel said in a statement.

The projects were chosen as part of a recent “all-source” solicitation for 600 megawatts of capacity that will help SRP hit its goal of adding 1,000 megawatts of new solar to its system by 2025 and meet customer needs going forward.

Both plants are scheduled to come online by June 2023 and will be owned and operated by subsidiaries of NextEra Energy Resources.

SRP, which is governed by its own elected board, has been criticized for not moving as fast as other Arizona utilities in adopting renewable energy resources. Recent announcements mark a shift in focus. Executives announced last year that SRP would add more solar and batteries to its grid in an effort to save money and reduce reliance on natural gas. At the time it had only 200 megawatts of solar power.

SRP also has a goal to reduce the amount of carbon emissions it generates per megawatt-hour by more than 60 percent by 2035 and by 90 percent in 2050.

Still, natural gas will make up the bulk of the missing capacity from the retired Navajo Generating Station. SRP purchased one block of the Gila River Power Station in 2016 and two 550-megawatt natural-gas generating units at Gila Station in 2017. The Mesquite plant purchase was made in 2012.

The good news for renewables is that SRP currently has a significant amount of baseload capacity available to help the grid remain reliable, which means that it can add a lot more solar before it starts to face some of the long-term problems utilities face when adopting a large amount of renewables, according Colin Smith, a senior analyst at Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables.

“SRP absolutely will be able to add more solar to the grid without disrupting their overall generation load,” he said.

“The biggest question, I think, is about lost jobs,” Smith added. “Solar, realistically, is only going to provide some short-term construction jobs as opposed to long-term jobs for engineers and people working at the coal plant.”

The human cost

The jobs impact from the NGS closure will disproportionately affect members of the Navajo Nation, who made up the vast majority of the coal plant’s workforce.

Clean energy entrepreneur Brett Isaac, who is Navajo and whose family still lives in the territory, is hopeful that renewable energy development will be able to create significant opportunities and lasting impact for his community.

A founder of Navajo Power, a Public Benefit Corporation developing clean energy projects on tribal lands, Isaac said he and his team are taking an inclusive approach to energy planning and designing their projects to generate long-term revenue streams for the tribe.

The two-year-old company is currently focused on deploying solar projects larger than 100 megawatts but over time plans to build a robust distributed energy business, which is more labor-intensive. The Navajo Power team believes it could develop up to 10 gigawatts of renewable energy on the Navajo Nation in Arizona and New Mexico, which would be a boon for the community and support a shift to new technology jobs.

Navajo Power has already secured land for its projects and is working to complete environmental reviews and establish offtake agreements for the large solar projects it plans to build. But the process of building support has been a challenge.

Convincing utilities, corporations and states that used to buy power from the Navajo Nation to sign new offtake agreements for projects located on tribal lands has been tough in the wake of the NGS closure. Engendering confidence within the Navajo Nation has been difficult as well.

Dealings with the “energy [industry have] been traumatic [for] indigenous communities,” said Isaac. “We don’t want to replicate things that have happened in the past [so] they lose their faith in the industry and…[become] resistant to the transition.”

He noted that the NGS coal plant closure has had a “human cost.” It took more than a year for NGS owners to finalize negotiations around closing the plant, putting plant workers and their families in a prolonged state of limbo.

In addition to employment issues, operating budgets for the Navajo Nation and the Hopi Tribe have relied on royalties from the Generating Station and from coal mines on their lands.

The Kayenta Coal Mine, which rolled its last trainload of coal to NGS in late August, used to purchase $9.9 million worth of electricity each year from the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority. The same month, the Peabody-owned mine laid off the last 265 of its workers, many of them members of the Hopi and Navajo tribes.

The transition

SRP and other NGS owners took several steps to limit the impact on tribal communities, according to SRP spokesperson Scott Harelson.

On the job front, SRP offered all 433 regular employees the opportunity to “redeploy” at other SRP facilities; nearly 300 accepted. SRP and other stakeholders in Arizona are also supporting a Re-Employment Center that will offer career training, certification programs and other job-seeker assistance.

In addition, the owners signed a 35-year extension lease with the Navajo Nation for plant retirement activities after 2019 and long-term monitoring. Arrangements were also made to allow for the ongoing operation of the transmission system on the Navajo Nation.

“Under the extension lease, the NGS owners will make lease payments totaling approximately $110 million to the Navajo Nation,” according to SRP.

The Navajo Nation will also take ownership of the remaining NGS assets, including a warehouse, lake pump system and railroad. The closure agreement also gave the tribe rights to transmission capacity at NGS. SRP said a federal government pledge to provide 500 megawatts of transmission capacity from the NGS system is valued at more than $80 million.

But according to Isaac, the Navajo Nation is still recovering decades’ worth of decisions that limited economic development and revenue generation in the region. Unemployment rates remain high, and roughly 15,000 homes on the Navajo Nation still don’t have power.

“And yet they have big 500-kilovolt power lines running over their homes,” he said.

A community-backed move to renewables

Attitudes around energy are shifting on the Navajo Nation. Communities that once opposed renewable energy development, viewing it as a threat to their coal jobs, now understand that alternative energy resources present new opportunities in a shifting energy landscape.

SRP is already working with the Navajo Nation to develop renewable energy on Navajo land and has partnered with the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority on the Kayenta I and Kayenta II solar power plants — the first large-scale solar projects in the territory — totaling approximately 60 megawatts of capacity.

Meanwhile, Navajo grassroots groups are tracking progress on the coal plant cleanup effort and continuing to urge Navajo Nation leaders to move away from the polluting resource. Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez appears to be heeding those calls.

Last Friday, the president refused to financially back bonds needed by the tribal energy company Navajo Transitional Energy Co. for three newly acquired coal mines located outside the reservation. Nez said the company was not transparent in its dealings and that the deal would put the tribe in a tricky financial position in the wake of coal plant closures and mining company bankruptcies.

The following day, Nez visited Navajo Power’s clean energy site and pledged to help the company get permits for its projects and find an offtaker for the power they generate.

“The leader appreciated that Navajo Power went through getting the proper consents from the community…and [is] going about it in a way that’s not trying to overstep or create conflict,” said Isaac.

While clean-energy advocates are looking to write a new chapter for Arizona following the NGS shutdown, there are some things they can learn from coal’s legacy, he added.

“Coal miners and plant operators have pride in what they’re doing,” Isaac said. “Solar can learn from that and create champions within the community — only this time, they can own the process while contributing to a cleaner environment.”

WOW – MISINFORMATION at Its Finest . . . 5G Cell Phone Radiation: How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People – SGT Report

HIGH LEVEL ‘INSIDER’ SOLUTION: About the ADVISORY – DEPLOYMENT of “Wireless” Smart Nodes a Military Weapons System

HIGH LEVEL ‘INSIDER’ SOLUTION: About the ADVISORY – DEPLOYMENT of “Wireless” Smart Nodes a Military Weapons System

Read more “HIGH LEVEL ‘INSIDER’ SOLUTION: About the ADVISORY – DEPLOYMENT of “Wireless” Smart Nodes a Military Weapons System”