DEW AS WE SAY w/ Deborah Tavares 2023/08/16

Ep. #610: DEW AS WE SAY w/ Deborah Tavares 2023/08/16
Into the Parabnormal – SOMEWHERE BETWEEN PARANORMAL & ABNORMAL

The devastating wildfires in Maui have brought back to the forefront fears of exterminating the population by any means necessary even if that means setting deadly fires and choking off the living.

Jeremy welcomes Deborah Tavares to expose the agenda of weaponized warfare through fires, the use of directed energy weapons and the role of utility companies.

https://rumble.com/v38fgci-2023-08-16-ep.-610-dew-as-we-say-w-deborah-tavares-into-the-parabnormal-w-j.html

https://odysee.com/@StopTheCrime:d/2023-08-16-Ep.-610-DEW-AS-WE-SAY-w-Deborah-Tavares-Into-The-Parabnormal-w-Jeremy-Scott:f

Hawaiian Electric faces financial, cost recovery risks from Maui wildfires: Moody’s | Utility Dive

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/hawaiian-electric-faces-financial-cost-recovery-risks-from-maui-wildfires-moodys-utility-dive?e=2eefef7b3e

MAUI, HAWAII- Scheduled to Burn – 

a Plan Secretly Scheduled in Advance

Electric Rate Payor’s Further Victimized – Will Ultimately be forced to PAY for the Planned Burn-up Program 

Law Firm Lines UP to DEFEND the VICTIMS

NEVER A WORD WILL BE MENTIONED ABOUT THE REAL CAUSE OF THE FIRE.

FREQUENCY and WEATHER WEAPONS

Both UN-acknowledged a Silent Weapons System

ENGAGED FOR MAXIMUM DESTRUCTION 

and GENOCIDE

Read more “Hawaiian Electric faces financial, cost recovery risks from Maui wildfires: Moody’s | Utility Dive”

Murder Chart

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/murder-chart?e=034698e356

MURDER CHARTHow to Get Away with MURDER
☠️
Impact of “Climate Change”
on Human Health 

Unacknowledged USE of Weather Weapons and Lab Created Bioweapons
The Road Map to Human Genocideand Death of ALL that is LIVING 
Colorful Cabal MURDER Chart 
BELOW

Describes How to Legalize MurderJust Call it “Climate Change” 
Posted byStopTheCrime.net

2023-08-01-deborahtavares-water-and-fire

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/2023-08-01-deborahtavares-water-and-fire?e=2eefef7b3e

2023-08-01-DEBORAHTAVARESWATER-AND-FIREDeborah’s newest radio interview on Project Camelot, with Kerry Cassidy.

RUMBLE AND ODYSEE LINKS BELOW:
https://rumble.com/v3485ft-2023-08-01-deborahtavares-water-and-fire.html
https://odysee.com/@StopTheCrime:d/2023-08-01-DEBORAHTAVARES-WATER-AND-FIREfinal1:eLINKS ABOVE

WIND FARMS -HAZARDS

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/wind-farms-hazards?e=034698e356

WIND FARMS -HAZARDS
Did You Know About This? UNDER AN IONIZED SKY
From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown
Indiana, USA and many other locations are DEPLOYING Wind Farms
Wind Farms are a Worldwide Deployment
Wind Farms and Fracking Well Stems

See http://waubrafoundation.org.au and the YouTube “Are Wind Turbines Changing the Weather?” (HowStuffWorks, June 24, 2013).



 Posted by StopTheCrime.net 
 
Visit a wind farm and you will quickly notice that life appears to have fled, which is strange, given how many think of wind farms as “green energy.” While driving through western Ontario, Canadian activist Suzanne Maher noted that what was once beautiful landscape and farmland had been replaced by hundreds of massive, imposing wind turbines. People in homes close to the turbines do not seem to realize they are living inside a power station that operates by creating low-pressure systems, with the blades of each turbine at a 15º angle from the oncoming wind (7.5º / 7.5º) soas to produce a toroid straight-line wind tunnel.   
      
Public protests are usually about devaluation of real estate and noise, but the pulsing itself is dangerous to mental and physical health. The infrasound and low frequency noise produce what is being called the wind-turbine syndrome:  headaches,sleep problems, night terrors, learning disabilities, ringing in the ears(tinnitus), mood swings (irritability, anxiety), concentration and memory problems, and equilibrium issues like dizziness and nausea. 

From the Mariana islands to Hawaii (through the Kwajalein Atoll), a line of transmitters fires northeast in a repetitious pulse—an invisible wall of radio waves all the way to Alaska that creates a funneling effect. Fire radio frequency into a front that’s been “seeded” with aluminum nanoparticles and a plasma-dense field arises, while the pressure wall off of Mexico acts like the bumper on a billiard table to roll the weather system north along the California-Oregon coastline to Vancouver Island and the jetstream ready to be pushed east and south through Wyoming and the Dakotas and into Kansas where NexRad and wind farm pulses will kick in to build high pressure for tornadoes, superstorms, and floods.[1]
Wind farms and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) wells are separated by exactly 300 miles, like GWEN towers, then calibrated together.  Fracking wells provide grounding points for wind farms while creating new faultlines for earthquake terraforming.

According to Billy Hayes “The HAARP Man,” the brine in the well heads of all new wells is treated with absorbents like the aluminum oxide and barium oxide being laid in chemtrails.

A directional explosive is then packed into the well to create perforations in the casing for about 20 feet out so the acid seeps down with the brine mix on top. This “re-dosing” must penetrate the casing because without water, it will float to the top of the well. 

Wind turbines and oil well stems have the same resonant length of 1,282 feet. Each rotation of a wind turbine gives off a powerful static charge.

 In fact, every time the turbines pulse at 2.95 Hz in 1-nanosecond pulses, the liquid mixture at the well head jumps 20 pounds up and 20 pounds down 3X per second like a hammer.This is called “thumping.” The discharge of the wind farms occurs in an arc at a certain length and a certain pulse that resonates with wells tuned to 2.95Hz. Put your hand on the casing and feel it twitch, like it’s alive.

            Both wind farms and fracking well stems have a part to play in the Space Fence infrastructure, along ionospheric heaters, NexRads, cell and GWEN towers, etc. It is because of how they pulse together that nations like Scotland[2] and states like Oklahoma[3] won’t be allowed to ban for long the unconventional practice of fracking.

[1] See http://waubrafoundation.org.au and the YouTube “Are WindTurbines Changing the Weather?” (HowStuffWorks, June 24, 2013).
[2] ClaireBernish, “Scotland Just Banned Fracking Forever.” Elle, August 6, 2016.
[3] EmilyAtkin, “Fracking Bans Are No Longer Allowed in Oklahoma.” Climate Progress, June 1,2015.
Elana Freeland, MA
 
THE GEOENGINEERING TRILOGY:
Geoengineered Transhumanism: How the Environment Has Been Weaponized by Chemicals, Electromagnetism & Nanotechnology for SyntheticBiology (2021)
Under An Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown(2018)
Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth (2014)
Sub Rosa America: A Deep State History series,2nd Ed. 2018
Blog site: elanafreeland.com


Rudolf Steiner: “In our time, the most important thing is to bring forward truths – put plainly, to give lectures about truths. What people then do about this is up to their freedom. One should go no further than to lecture on, to communicate truths.  Whatever consequences there are should follow as a free decision, thus as consequences follow when decisions are made out of the impulses one has on the physical plane. It is exactly the same in the case of things that can only beguided from the spiritual world itself.” – Secret Brotherhoods and theMystery of the Human Double, 7 Lectures in St. Gallen, Zurich and Dornach,1917

DEATHS – Officials raise alarm over what they say caused over a million deaths-“climate change”

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/war-of-the-weathers-9380177?e=[UNIQID]

GENOCIDE 

MURDER RATES on TRACK

DEATHS- Officials Raise Alarm Over What They Say Caused 

OVER a  MILLION DEATHS – Due to “CLIMATE CHANGE” 

The WHO reports

see the video in the link

https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2023/07/05/who-conference-climate-change-contd-cnni-intl-vpx.cnn

Officials raise alarm over what they saycaused over a million deaths

The World Health Organization (WHO) says that over 1.4 million deaths per year in Europe can be attributed to environmental factors like climate change. Hans Kluge, WHO regional director,joins CNN to discuss.

POISONOUS DRINKING WATER – REQUIRED BY CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDAS

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/war-of-the-weathers-9380145?e=[UNIQID]

POISONOUS DRINKING WATER 
REQUIRED BY CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDA’S 
 
Recycled TOXIC water from sewers (Feces, Urine and Pharma Drugs) coming to your neighborhood taps for drinking, bathing, watering plants, for your pets and everything else you use water for.
Sewer water will and has been blended into reservoirs from up stream locations and goes directly into our homes, businesses, schools, restaurants, swimming pools, drinking fountains and more.

This is NOTonly a California Agenda
These PlansARE Worldwide 


https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Recycled-water-from-sewer-OK-d-for-California-12735732.php
Recycledwater from sewers coming to California taps
TedAndersen
Water that once coursed through the sewer may soon make its way out of your home faucet.
New regulations approved March 6 by the State Water Resources Control Board allow treated recycled water to be added to reservoirs, the source of California cities’ municipal drinking water supply.


The regulations specify the percentage of recycled water that can be added and how long it must reside there before being treated again at a surface water treatment facility and provided as drinking water,according to the Water Board.
“This is a type of indirect potable use — it’s not treated recycle water that goes directly to someone’s house,” said MiryamBarajas at the Water Board. “It’s highly treated.”
How California plans to crack down on water waste
Barajas said San Diego is leading the state in infrastructure to begin carrying out a sewer-to-reservoir operation but the rest of the state will likely follow.
California has 36 main reservoirs and Barajas said the decision could potentially affect all of them but it is unclear how long that could take.
“The regulations are now there but the infrastructure is not,” she said.
The decision was the culmination of a two-year public review process, which included an independent scientific review and guidance by an expert panel that determined the regulations adequately protect public health. It was also the latest effort to develop uniform rules allowing for more use of recycled water to supplement existing drinking water supplies.
The State Water Board is also working onregulations for “direct potable reuse,” in which treated recycled water is added directly into a drinking water system or into a raw water supply immediately upstream of a water treatment plant. These rules are expected by2023.
Water recycling is part of the California Water Action Plan and Senate bills 918 and 322 direct the Water Board to investigate to create regulations for direct and indirect potable reuse.
The Water Boardsays it funded more than $748 million worth of water recycling projects lastyear in 2018.  

Investigations on the health issues of drinking sewer water are OVER.  
This poison water will cause illness and degrade life.  
Thisis the SDG’s – Water Action Plans adopted in your cities.  
Lookup the Sustainable Development Goals in your city.
StopTheCrime.net

WAR of the WEATHERS

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/war-of-the-weathers?e=2eefef7b3e

New York Times Archives original April 17, 1976
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS?
From StopTheCrime.net

https://stopthecrime.net/wp/2021/02/12/war-of-the-weathers/ Credit…The New York Times Archives

See the article in its original context from
April 17, 1976,

SANTA MONICA, Calif.— “From space one could control the earth’s weather, cause drought and floods, change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, make temperate climates frigid,” then‐Senator Lyndon B. Johnson told a joint session of Congress in 1957. Like many other legislators, he accepted Defense Department fantasies that the United States was in race with the Soviet Union to develop environmental weapons.

Mr. Johnson as President made the fantasies real by ordering rainmaking in Southeast Asia, Between 1967 and 1972 he and President Richard M. Nixon authorized at least $3.6 million annually on secret cloud‐seeding over North and South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia in an attempt to muddy trails and slow enemy movements.

Although in one instance this enhanced rainfall by 30 percent, Pentagon officials call the operations failure. But the Pentagon defends them as humane, saying, “Raindrops don’t kill people; bombs do.” (The Department of Defense denies it was seeding over North Vietnam in 1971 when that nation suffered the heaviest rains since 1945. In 1945. a million Vietnamese died of flood and famine.)Can a nation that tampers with natural balances deny responsibility for what follows?

This question, together with recognition that United States policy condemns warfare aimed at civilians, prompted Senator Claiborne Pell in 1973 to introduce a resolution calling for an international treaty to prohibit environmental warfare “or the carrying out of any research or experimentation directed thereto.” The Senate voted 82 to 10 to approve the resolution, which lacks force of law.

Last August, at the 31‐nation United Nations conference of the Committee on Disarmament, in Geneva, the United States and Soviet Union jointly proposed a draft convention to ban “military or any other hostile use of environmental techniques.” Unfortunately it is far weaker than the Senate resolution. For example, it fails to prohibit military research or development of environmental‐modification techniques, and allows all “peaceful” work on such things.

The Pentagon says its Climate Dynamics program, formerly Project Nile Blue, is peaceful and needed to detect Soviet attempts to disrupt North American weather.

(Because the treaty appoints no inspection agency to enforce its ban, leaving nations to bring evidence of violations to the United Nations Security Council, treaty ratification would justify increased funding for Climate Dynamics monitoring.)

But Climate Dynamics researchers using computer models of oceans and atmosphere, have studied ways to melt the polar ice caps, generate destructive storms, and otherwise use “key environmental instabilities” to release huge amounts of energy. They have found how the United States, acting secretly from space, could inflict bad weather on the Soviet Union, thereby ruining harvests and keeping that country dependent on United States grain imports.
In the Soviet Union, engineers are reversing the Arctic‐flowing Pechora River and creating inland seas, actions that experts say will alter global climate. This is “peaceful.”

In 1975 the National Academy of Sciences reported that cooling in the Northern Hemisphere since the 1940’s makes the start of a new ice age within 100 years a small but real possibility. Scientists cannot determine whether the cooling is caused by humans or if one nation’s had weather is caused by another’s weather‐modification programs, so the potential for hostility arising from such programs is obvious. Global climatic changes will prompt many nations to use such modification techniques, but the world’s unstable political climate demands that such techniques be internationally regulated, with adequate safeguards and with reparations for those who suffer drought or storm damage.

The draft treaty could be a step toward such regulation. But the treaty allows some weather warfare by prohibiting only techniques having “widespread, long‐lasting or severe effects harmful to human welfare.” What does this mean? The tiniest tampering with natural balances can set off chain reactions with unforeseen consequences.Senator Pell and Representatives Gilbert Gude and Donald M. Fraser have proposed that all United States environmental‐modification research—by civilians, the military and the Central Intelligence Agency—he put under Congressional control. Until this is done and the United States amends the draft treaty to eliminate loopholes and cloudy language, few nations will believe we want environmental warfare banned.

Lowell Ponte is author of the forthcoming book “The Cooling,” about climatic change and modification.


ENVIRONMENTAL WARFARE has INCREASED
Disguised as Climate Change

BUT We Know This, Right?

From StopTheCrime.net

“Dead trees all over the city”

https://mailchi.mp/arccopy/dead-trees-all-over-the-city?e=2eefef7b3e

“Dead trees all over the city”

Where tree-planting efforts go wrong

Funding for tree planting is a necessary waste of tax payers hard earned money – WHY? 

Firstly, no one discusses the years of Aerosol spraying and how toxic the soils are along with heavy metals, EVERYWHERE. 

TREES AND PLANTS CAN NO LONGER SURVIVE IN THE INTENTIONALLY CREATED POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT 

NO ONE WILL TELL YOU PLANTS AND ALL LIVING THINGS ARE BEING EXTERMINATED. 

PLANT MATERIAL HELPS TO BLOCK 5G’s Deadly frequencies and the frequencies of neighborhood acoustic weapons when we are targeted in our communities and homes.

From coast to coast, cities are working toward tree-planting goals, and the White House is all in, announcing in April $1 billion in grants for communities to increase “equitable” access to trees and green spaces.  

Government GRANT funding for tree planting is only disbursed within a specific time  table and cities are desperately trying to get trees in the ground because the grant cycle which typicially ends in a year.

Your city wants to prove they are interested in taking your money and proving they want trees they are not able to maintain.

NOW cities, counties, states tell us we MUST REDUCE OUR OUTSIDE WATERING and some areas folks are fined and penalized if they water any outside landscaping.

DOUBLE SPEAK – a WORLD OF DOUBLE SPEAK.

GRANTS FOR TREE PLANTING is a necessary waste to keep an illusion of planting trees while killing plant life at the same time.

Geoengineering aka Chemtrail fallout, contaminated soil, Toxins added in many commercial foods and fertilizers, and high intensity EMF from ground transmitters similar in function to the old HAARP, and the use of cell phone systems. 

Some trees resonate with the EMF frequencies and die quickly, others like some evergreens are more resistant to EMF damage. Low voltage is often generated in the ground as eddy currents (when emf hits the ground and creates a second current that goes up the tree from the ground) form the EMF and this can retard growth or kill trees too.

We learned that the heavy metals from the aerosol spraying aka Geoengineering/Chemical Trails are taken up into the trees through the root system.  The tree roots clog similar to how plaque clogs human arteries and the trees are unable to absorb water which is blocked by the heavy metals.  ALL trees have been compromised.  Millions are standing dead in forest waiting to be sparked by fire causing weapons.

We are told all the dead and dying trees are due 

to Climate Change while Weather Weapons remain Unacknowledged. 

WAKE UP

OUR TREES ARE INTENTIONALLY DYING

OUR OXYGEN COMES FROM TREES AND PLANTS

TREE planting sounds Nobel and environmentalists 

believe tree planting efforts will benefit communities and restore the sheer cutting of forests and in the Amazon, along with being a carbon sink to reduce CARBON which is OUR OXYGEN.  

Sadly, most folks are unaware of the real intentions behind all these wasted efforts.  

GENOCIDE

https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/increasing-tree-canopy-underserved-areas-not-simple/653956/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Issue:%202023-06-27%20Smart%20Cities%20Dive%20Newsletter%20%5Bissue:51562%5D&utm_term=Smart%20Cities%20Dive

“Dead trees all over the city”: Where tree-planting efforts go wrong

As federal funds flow toward urban forestry, collaboration with residents and appropriate technical expertise can lead to more tree-planting success, one researcher says.

Ysabelle Kempe

Nature has emerged as a key partner for cities looking to advance environmental justice and prepare for and mitigate worsening climate change. From coast to coast, cities are working toward tree-planting goals, and the White House is all in, announcing in April $1 billion in grants for communities to increase equitable access to trees and green spaces.

While the funding presents a “tremendous opportunity,” achieving this goal is not as simple as planting as many trees as possible in underserved communities, said Lincoln Larson, an associate professor at North Carolina State University.

How communities can successfully develop and execute equitable tree-planting plans is the focus of Larson’s research, which is supported by the U.S. Forest Service. 

Permission granted by NCSU College of Natural Resources

Smart Cities Dive caught up with Larson to discuss the potential worst outcome of tree-planting efforts, whether trees are inherently valuable to society and why communities in most need of trees may not welcome more.

Editor’s note: This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

SMART CITIES DIVE: What opportunities and risks do communities face, with all the recent attention allocated to trees?

LINCOLN LARSON: While we’re pretty good at identifying where trees need to be planted, actually working with communities to get that done in a way that resonates with community members and aligns with their goals, preferences, concerns, all of the above becomes a lot more challenging, especially when you realize that you can’t just put a tree in the ground. You have to nurture it, you have to care for it and maintain it. 

The worst outcome — which is what we see in a lot of cities with tree-planting programs that don’t have resources and community buy-in to sustain themselves — [is] you end up with dead trees all over the city. That’s a worse outcome than no trees for a lot of people.

And those dead trees are due to a lack of maintenance?

Yeah. Sometimes, when you’re planting trees, especially in narrow right-of-ways or on private property, it’s hard to maintain them, with watering and tree pests. We see that nationally, with a lot of invasive [insect] species coming in and threatening urban tree species. If you don’t have a support team, with the technical expertise and the resources to support tree growth over the long term, you can run into challenges.

How can tree-planting programs avoid those unwanted outcomes?

A lot of tree-planting professionals and NGOs that focus on tree equity operate with the assumption that everybody views trees as this inherent good for society. But the reality is that many members of the public don’t. 

In a lot of communities, for a variety of reasons, trees are seen as a problem. They’re a maintenance issue. They create opportunities for perceived crime in densely forested settings. Sometimes trees fuel property [value] rises and [higher] property taxes, which is a good thing, but it also can catalyze green gentrification, which drives residents out of neighborhoods where they might have been for generations. 

Keep up with the story. Subscribe to the Smart Cities Dive free daily newsletter

Are there common pitfalls of tree-planting programs when it comes to developing an equitable urban forest?

The obvious one is don’t plant trees without public input and community involvement. Yet we do it so often. I think that happens a lot, too, when we’re desperately trying to get trees in the ground because the grant cycle ends in a year, or whatever the motivation may be. It’s often easier to just plant on public property. In a lot of cases, that may work. In others, it may be that if you want to increase canopy coverage in underserved neighborhoods, you have to find a way to do it on private property because there may not be a lot of public green spaces that exist in these areas where it’s ripe for the planting, if you will.

That dichotomy presents challenges, especially in a lot of these areas where you have predominantly renters with absentee landlords who may or may not allow this. Suddenly you have a strange dynamic again about who has access to trees. Do you have to be a homeowner to get trees? 

What do you recommend?

The solution to a lot of these problems is understanding that there are local community organizations and nonprofits embedded in those spaces already who are really engaged in social justice, environmental justice issues, and know what the community needs and is looking for. 

Work with these organizations [and] don’t think that your same practice that worked elsewhere is going to work in this place. Take a little bit of time to get to know the place, the key players, and work within their system and the organizations that are based there to make things happen. Yes, it takes time, but that is time well spent, if your goal is a healthy urban forest.

Comments and Article Distributed by 

StopTheCrime.net

PrimaryWater.org