In short, populations are being condensed into highly populated locations with complete monitoring and without cars.  Vast wireless networks with multiple layers of frequencies,  will direct the thoughts and minds of all people. The use of weather weapons is rapidly forcing implementation of the transformations we are all being conscripted into.  All resources will be rationed and EVERY aspect of everyone and everything will be tracked and monitored.  There is much more to discuss on the social engineering of entire populations and we cover that in the various documents posted onStopTheCrime.net.

Sea level rise is being created artificially as you will read in the insider comment below.

There is MUCH more to discuss and expose and we suggest you sign up for the email blasts and regularly go to StopTheCrime.net and view our YouTube video’s to listen to the latest documents we are exposing . . .

Definition of CONSENSUS – CONSENSUS depends on participants having shared values and goals, and on having broad agreement on specific issues and overall direction.  Consensus implies that everyone accepts and supports the decisions, and understands the reasons for making those decisions.  These advisory meetings, as they are often called,  are facilitated and manipulated by trained leaders that create the illusion that your ideas are being crafted into policies for your community.  These meetings employ the DELPHI technique which is a format of manipulation and control and promotes the CONsensus plot.   Tightly monitored control of those citizens in attendance is the manipulation necessary to create the illusion that we the people are creating these policies.  We are NOT creating these polices!  ALL these agendas (policies) have already been created and are being stealthily agreed and accepted by your incorporated governments, officials and ALL departments.  

These policies are being conceived through CONsensus and insidiously implemented without the publics knowledge and informed consent based upon REAL SCIENCE.  

Remember, OUR governments are d’facto and exist, TODAY, in name ONLY . . .  

Those in attendance at  advisory meetings or public meetings will typically be broken up into small groups and seated at “separate” round tables thinking they have been given an opportunity to provide input that will be  considered into the final decisions in the plans.   The trained leader manipulating the discussion will ask pre-scripted questions that have already been decided upon before the meeting.  These answers will often be noted on a large easel with paper.  The citizens are separated into small groups to prevent the likelihood of the those in attendance coming together in dissent and opposition of their plan.   This is NOT science we have been TRICKED into agreeing on vast economic and far reaching agendas that are hidden behind population reduction policies, worldwide.  This is about GENOCIDE!

As the U.S. implements its Asia-Pacific Rebalance strategy, it will need to strongly consider how climate change will complicate that strategic objective – including its growing humanitarian assistance/ disaster relief (HA/DR) role.

Evidence suggests that climate change may make cyclones and other tropical storms more intense.

In short, the physical landscape in which the U.S. military operates is no longer a fixed “given.” Since the U.S. military’s numerous coastal military installations lie in a rapidly changing landscape, it will have to adapt, and adapt quickly. Adjusting to that unstable environment will be essential for the U.S. military to be able to maintain its ability to fulfill its core mission. At the center of this adjustment lies a fundamental need to build a resilient military infrastructure that supports the “global military force”. Time is an important factor. As noted in the 2016 SERDP report on managing uncertainty for coastal risk management, “Uncertainty is not a reason for inaction, because taking no action is a decision in itself.”14 SERDP’s 2013 report on climate impacts and coastal military installations also noted that the decisions, or lack of decisions, that are being made today will drive how vulnerable the military’s “assets and capabilities” will be, in the face of climatic risks, for “many decades to come.”15

If it is to meet the goals of protecting the American people, U.S. allies, and national interests, the defense community does not have the luxury of waiting until events transpire to prepare for, respond to, and mitigate these risks. With a number of new efforts complete or underway, the security community now has sufficient understanding of the risks of climate change and sea level rise to justify comprehensive action – especially for coastal bases and their surrounding communities that are already feeling the effects (and incurring the damage).

The first category includes consideration of climate change as a strategic risk, given the possibility that it will as an “accelerant of instability or conflict, placing a burden to respond on civilian institutions and militaries around the world.” The second category includes consideration of the “30 U.S. military installations that were already facing elevated levels of risk from rising sea levels,” along with a much larger group of military sites that will face elevated risks throughout the 21st century.21 As with its treatment of other security risks, the DoD has based its assessment of climate change risks on the best available science.

New modeling conducted by the US Geological Survey as part of a study on DoD installations uses techniques that consider the interaction of higher sea levels with storm- induced “wave-driven” flooding. The results indicate that low-lying atolls may experience more severe inundation sooner than previously estimated, with “wave-driven water levels” causing twice as much land area to be flooded than currently predicted.3

________________________________________________________________

INSIDER COMMENT – NOT part of the military report excerpt:

This is an excerpt from the military report – Infrastructure at coastal installations is in need of upgrade or replacement. Integrating already planned or forecast construction planning and execution with efforts that will be required to deal with sea level rise will eliminate project duplication or conflicts in project execution and will permit development of realistic long-term infrastructure programming.