Prion connection CV-19 VAX-a BioWeapon – the abstract

Prion connection CV-19 VAX
a BioWeapon – the abstract

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Deborah-Tavares—Prion-connection-CV-19-VAX–a-BioWeapon—the-abstract.html?soid=1111839869613&aid=Ka_ekOJhI6k

Prion connection CV-19 VAX a BioWeapon – the abstract
 Dr. J. Bart Classen explains how the mRNA vaccines pose a prion risk (and potentially others). What stood out is on the bottom of page 2 to the top of page 3 once they inject people: “Genetic diversity protects species from mass casualties caused by infectious agents. One individual may be killed by a virus while another may have no ill effects from the same virus. By placing the identical receptor, the spike protein, on cells of everyone in a population, the genetic diversity for at least one potential receptor disappears. Everyone in the population now becomes potentially susceptible to binding with the same infectious agent.”
Here is the link https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf and the PDF in case link is removed.

Sentinel surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater

Sewer analysis may provide most relevant information on the localization of areas where COVID-19 cases reappear, enabling immediate response to prevent spread of the outbreak. Nevertheless, it represents a more laborious and costly approach that surveillance through WWTP monitoring. 

Sentinel surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater anticipates the occurrence of COVID-19 cases

Gemma Chavarria-Miró, Eduard Anfruns-Estrada, Susana Guix, Miquel Paraira, Belén Galofré, Gloria Sánchez, Rosa M. Pintó1, Albert Bosch1

1 These authors were co–principal investigators.

Affiliations:

Enteric Virus laboratory, Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, Section of Microbiology, Virology and Biotechnology, School of Biology, and Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

University of Barcelona, Spain. (G. Echevarria-Miró, E. Anfruns-Estrada, S. Guix, R.M. Pintó, A. Bosch)

Aigües de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (M. Paraira, B. Galofré)

Department of Preservation and Food Safety Technologies, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, IATA-CSIC, Paterna, Valencia, Spain. (G. Sánchez)

Running Title: Sentinel surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater 

AR Powered – Teleportation Mark Zuckerberg: How smart glasses could help combat climate change

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/08/mark-zuckerberg-how-smart-glasses-could-help-combat-climate-change.html

KEY POINTS

  • Mark Zuckerberg said on Monday that by 2030, people could use advanced smart glasses to “teleport” to other people’s homes, and speak to them as if they’re physically present.
  • This would enable in-person meetings to be replaced by a headset-based digital experience, which could fight climate change by reducing commutes and travel.
  • Zuckerberg’s remarks are notable because they represent a cohesive vision from an industry leader of why they are betting big on augmented reality, which is increasingly seen as the next computing shift after the smartphone.
Oculus Quest 2

Oculus Quest 2Facebook

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Monday that by 2030, people could use advanced smart glasses to “teleport” to locations like other people’s homes, and speak to them as if they’re physically present, allowing in-person meetings to be replaced by a headset-based digital experience.

One upshot of this vision of the future could be a reduction in travel for business or pleasure, which could help ameliorate the effects of climate change, Zuckerberg said in an interview with The Information.

Obviously, there are going to keep on being cars and planes and all that. But the more that we can teleport around, not only are we personally eliminating commutes and stuff that’s kind of a drag for us individually, but I think that’s better for society and for the planet overall, too,” Zuckerberg said.

Most big technology firms, including AppleMicrosoft, and Google, are working on augmented reality technology, which overlays computer-generated graphics on images of the real world. They’re all competing to shape the next major computer interface after the smartphone and touchscreen.

Zuckerberg’s remarks are notable because they represent a cohesive vision from an industry leader of what augmented reality technology can do for consumers, not just other businesses, and he identifies software that could be the hook to get people to buy and subsequently wear advanced computers on their face: virtual in-person communication.

The ultimate vision years down the road, as Zuckerberg said on Monday, is a pair of normal-looking computer-powered glasses that can display content alongside the real world through transparent displays.

“There are going to be all these awesome use cases that come from this….rather than calling someone or having a video chat, you just kind of snap your fingers and teleport, and you’re sitting there and they’re on their couch and it feels like you’re there together,” Zuckerberg said.

Zuckerberg says one advantage to AR-powered “teleportation” is that it could reduce travel or commute time. Ultimately, AR could allow workers to live where they want, perhaps a less expensive region, and “basically teleport to work,” Zuckerberg said.

“We talked a little bit about climate change before just being so important,” Zuckerberg said. “People are just going to want to maybe travel a little less in the future and do it more efficiently, and be able to go places without having to take the travel or commute time.”

Zuckerberg’s interview comes as the social media company plans to release a pair of smart glasses in partnership with Ray-Ban later this year, although he said they wouldn’t be “full AR,” which means they won’t display advanced virtual objects. Facebook plans to release more advanced AR glasses as technology gets better.

Facebook also develops virtual reality headsets which lack transparent displays through Oculus, which it purchased in 2014 for $2 billion. It currently sells the Oculus 2, a $300 virtual reality headset. Zuckerberg said he believes that software makers will start making software in virtual reality before transitioning to augmented reality, and calls the two technologies “two sides of the same coin.”

Dozens Of Spontaneous Miscarriages, Stillbirths After COVID-19 Jabs

Published on March 8, 2021

Written by Meiling Lee

Thirty-four cases of pregnant women experiencing spontaneous miscarriages or stillbirths after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine have been submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS is a passive reporting system that allows people to submit a report of an adverse event after vaccination and is run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Research funded by the CDC has shown that fewer than 1 percent of reactions from vaccinations are being reported on VAERS.

Reports made to VAERS do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused the event or reaction. Miscarriages are labeled as spontaneous abortions or abortions in the reporting system.

Many cases of spontaneous miscarriages occurred in the first trimester, or the first 12 weeks of the pregnancy, with 25 occurrences after being immunized with a Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. While the four cases of stillborns occurred in either the second (weeks 13–27) or third trimester (weeks 28–40).

According to Verywell Health, an online resource on health-related issues: “Research suggests that between 10% and 20% of women with a medically confirmed pregnancy will end in miscarriage. Eighty percent of these will occur during the first trimester.”

A health worker administers a dose of the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine to a pregnant woman at Clalit Health Services, in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Jan. 23, 2021. (Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images)

In one case, a physician in Tennessee, at five weeks pregnant, suffered a miscarriage 13 days after being immunized with a Pfizer vaccine. The 31-year-old woman had no known allergies or medical history.

A 33-year-old Indiana nurse in her third week of pregnancy had a miscarriage five days after receiving her second Pfizer vaccine. She also reported that the adverse event caused a birth defect.

And a 32-year-old woman in Virginia who was eight weeks pregnant reported having a miscarriage five days after being injected with the first dose of a Moderna vaccine in January. She had consulted with two obstetrics and gynecologists (OB-GYN) prior to receiving the vaccine on Jan. 14. She experienced abdominal cramping and vaginal bleeding two days later and had a miscarriage on Jan. 19. She had only been taking prenatal vitamins.

In Michigan, a 35-year-old woman who was 28 weeks and five days pregnant said that the baby’s movements decreased two days after her first Pfizer vaccine in December 2020. The woman delivered a stillborn baby weighing two pounds and seven ounces at 29 weeks. She was being closely monitored for an umbilical cord abnormality called velamentous cord insertion.

Pfizer and Moderna didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.

In addition, the FDA didn’t immediately reply to The Epoch Times’ inquiry on whether the regulatory agency will be looking into the VAERS report. An FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email that their subject matter experts working with vaccines are “quite busy” at the moment.

Dr. Shelley Cole, MD, an OB-GYN and a member of America’s Frontline Doctors, says it’s concerning that a vaccine still in an experimental phase is being recommended to pregnant and lactating women and that science is no longer protecting them.

“As an obstetrician-gynecologist, it is a concern,” Cole told The Epoch Times. “We’re [now] throwing science and the scientific medicine method out the window and jeopardizing pregnancies and future pregnancies.”

“It concerns me that the CDC says that there are no studies, but it’s okay to get it and you don’t even need to discuss it with your doctor,” Cole said. “I mean this is the opposite of everything that the scientific models and methods, and standard of care has been for a century.”

In its guidance on “Vaccination Considerations for People who are Pregnant or Breastfeeding,” the CDC says that pregnant or lactating women who are “part of a group recommended to receive COVID-19 vaccine, such as healthcare personnel, may choose to be vaccinated” and that they are not required to discuss with their doctor “prior to vaccination” even though there is limited evidence “available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines” in this group.

There is also no safety data on the “effects of mRNA vaccines on the breastfed infant or on milk production/excretion,” yet the vaccine is “not thought to be a risk to the breastfeeding infant.”

The Logo of the World Health Organization (WHO) at their headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, on Feb. 24, 2020. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

The World Health Organization (WHO), in a news release on Jan. 8, said it does not recommend the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant women unless they are at high risk of exposure, such as a health care practitioner.

“Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 than non-pregnant women, and COVID-19 has been associated with an increased risk of pre-term birth,” the WHO said. “However, due to insufficient data, WHO does not recommend the vaccination of pregnant women at this time.”

The WHO initially put out the same recommendation for the Moderna vaccine on Jan. 26, but revised it three days later, saying, “We don’t have any specific reason to believe there will be specific risks that would outweigh the benefits of vaccination for pregnant women,” thus pregnant women in the health care environment or “who have comorbidities which add to their risk of severe disease” may receive the vaccine.

Pregnant or lactating women were excluded from both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials, but Pfizer is currently conducting a phase 2/3 trial on 4,000 healthy, pregnant women who will be given the shots during the second and third trimester.

Governmental health agencies and health care personnel who recommend the vaccines claim that pregnant women “have an increased risk of severe illness, including illness that results in ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death compared with non-pregnant women of reproductive age.”

Dr. Denise Jamieson, MD, MPH, chair of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Emory University School of Medicine, recommends pregnant women get the vaccine regardless of what trimester they are in and recognizes that safety data is lacking.

“If you’re a health care worker in a healthcare setting, you’re at risk every day,” Jamieson told JAMA Network on Feb. 8. “So I would advise to get vaccinated soon and not delay regardless of the trimester.”

“I think one of the other things that’s really important is just because we think the benefits outweigh the risks, that doesn’t let us off the hook in terms of describing the risks,” she said. “And I think that’s one thing that I’m concerned about is that, you know, 15,000 women have been vaccinated, pregnant persons have been vaccinated, and yet we really have stunningly little safety information, and that’s not okay.”

www.theepochtimes.com

Vaccines – The Second Oldest Profession

https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/03/vaccines-the-oldest-scam.html?_ga=2.103290569.871266013.1614184867-903648786.1588285733

Vaccines – The Second Oldest Profession

March 9, 2021
mullins-cover.jpg
In 1988, Eustace Mullins blew the whistle on the vaccine scam. Order the book here.Pfizer and BioNTech Announce Extremely Positive Phase 3 COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data; Production of 1.3 Billion Doses in 2021 Planned
Pfizer CEO sold $5.6 million in stock on the day of Vaccine Announcement 
Not only do drugmakers make huge profits 
from vaccines, but they continue to profitfrom the illnesses vaccines cause.If vaccines weren’t harmful to health,why would pharmaceutical companies be exempt from liability? This goose has been laying a golden eggfor more than a century, at an indescribable toll in human suffering. Now they want to make vaccinations – not one but regular shots –a condition for participation in society and freedom. And the new vaccines may trigger a fatal over-response on exposure to a virus.“The practice of medicine may not be the world’s oldest profession, but it is often seen to be operating on much the same principles.” Eustace Mullins

Updated from Nov 12, 2020Excerpts from Murder by Injection (1988)by Eustace Mullins(henrymakow.com)

Despite the great power of the hidden rulers, I found that only one group has the power to issue life or death sentences to any American — our nation’s physicians.

I discovered that these physicians, despite their great power, were themselves subjected to very strict controls over every aspect of their professional lives. These controls, surprisingly enough, were not wielded by any state or federal agency, although almost every other aspect of American life is now under the absolute control of the bureaucracy. The physicians have their own autocracy, a private trade association, the American Medical Association. This group, which is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, had gradually built up its power until it assumed total control over medical schools and the accreditation of physicians.
—————-
From its earliest inception [in 1847], the American Medical Association has had one principal objective, attaining and defending a total monopoly of the practice of medicine in the United States. From its outset, the AMA made allopathy the basis of its practice. Allopathy was a type of medicine whose practitioners had received training in a recognized academic school of medicine, and who relied heavily on surgical procedures and the use of medications.


1679-eustace-mullins.jpg(Eustace Mullins 1923-2010)
The practice of immunization goes directly against the discovery of modern holistic medical experts that the body has a natural immune defense against illness. The Church of Modern Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the term, “immunization.” 
The greatest heresy any physician can commit is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four Holy Waters, but the most deeply entrenched in modern medical practice is undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly. Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, “My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future.”  (p.79) —
Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana finds that “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.” (p.81)

Another well-known medical practitioner, Dr. J. M. Peebles of San Francisco, has written a book on vaccine, in which he says,
“The vaccination practice, pushed to the front on all occasions by the medical profession through political connivance made compulsory by the state, has not only become the chief menace and the greatest danger to the health of the rising generation, but likewise the crowning outrage upon the personal liberties of the American citizen; compulsory vaccination, poisoning the crimson currents of the human system with brute-extracted lymph under the strange infatuation that it would prevent smallpox, was one of the darkest blots that disfigured the last century.”
Dr. Peebles refers to the fact that the cowpox vaccine was one of the more peculiar “inventions or discoveries of the Age of Enlightenment.” However, as I have pointed out in “The Curse of
Canaan,” the Age of Enlightenment was merely the latest program of the Cult of Baal and its rituals of child sacrifice, which, in one guise or another, has now been with us for some five thousand years. Because of this goal, the Medical Monopoly is also known as “The Society for Crippling Children.”  (p.81-82)
—–
md-dance.jpg(COVID scam perpetrated by the medical profession) 
However, the peril of even one state legislature foiling their criminal conspiracy caused the Rockefeller Syndicate to concentrate on perfecting an instrument for controlling each and every state legislature in these United States. This was achieved by setting up the Council of State Governments in Chicago. Its ukases are routinely issued to every state legislator, and such is its totalitarian control that not one legislature has ever failed to follow its dictates.
Edward Jenner (1796-1839) “discovered” that cowpox vaccine would supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth-century scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the century, due to a number of contributing factors. 
After the use of the cowpox vaccine became widespread in England, a smallpox epidemic broke out which killed 22,081 people. The smallpox epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In 1872, 44,480 people were killed by it. 
England finally banned the vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely heralded “contributions” which that country had made to modern medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its dangers were hurried off to jail. (p. 83) —-Polio has increased 700% in states which have compulsory vaccination. The much-quoted writer on medical problems, Morris Beale, who for years edited his informative publication, Capsule News Digest, from Capitol Hill, offered a standing reward during the years from 1954 to 1960 of $30,000, which he would pay to anyone who could prove that the polio vaccine was not a killer and a fraud. There were no takers.
spanish-flu.jpgMedical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu “epidemic” of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called “the Spanish Influenza,” a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called “the Russian Flu.” For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.

The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk magazine notes that “during the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was high.”
In what is now known as “the Great Swine Flu Massacre,” the President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the major drug manufacturers. They had a “swine flu” vaccine which suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other market, humans. 
The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine came directly from the Disease Control Center in Atlanta, Georgia. Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter offered no serious threat in the election. 
nurse-scam.png(In your face)
Suddenly, out of Atlanta, came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national immunization campaign against “swine flu.” The fact that there was not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs, which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one bright young man remarked, “Well if the swine breeders won’t inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into people.”
The Ford sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early death, when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris, formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at the Food and Ding Administration, declared that there could be no authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public with his statement that “at no point were the swine flu vaccines effective.” He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done. (84-85)

News Release Dead Locust Ear-on-a-Chip

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?ca=111d4e0e-d21d-407d-a928-eff3f0b37491&preview=true&m=1111839869613&id=preview

News Release Dead Locust Ear-on-a-Chip
A world first: A robot able to “hear” through the ear of a locust 
Posted on StopTheCrime.net 
INSIDER COMMENT:
It’s all frequency, Deborah, and if you can capture and code the frequency, whole species can be controlled, and they are.

Most people will think it’s biblical, just like floods and tidal waves, which of course we know are caused by “secret” technologies. (ELANA)
After You ReadA robot able to “hear” through the ear of a locust_____________________
Read These two Articles linked at the bottom of this News ReleaseThe Biblical locust plagues of 2020 – BBC Future _________________

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-03/tu-awf030221.php
A world first: A robot able to “hear” through the ear of a locust2-Mar-2021News Release Tel Aviv University researchers connect a real locust ear to a robotTel-Aviv UniversityResearch News
Credit: Tel Aviv UniversityA technological and biological development that is unprecedented in Israel and the world has been achieved at Tel Aviv University. For the first time, the ear of a dead locust has been connected to a robot that receives the ear’s electrical signals and responds accordingly. The result is extraordinary: When the researchers clap once, the locust’s ear hears the sound and the robot moves forward; when the researchers clap twice, the robot moves backwards.The interdisciplinary study was led by Idan Fishel, a joint master student under the joint supervision of Dr. Ben M. Maoz of the Iby and Aladar Fleischman Faculty of Engineering and the Sagol School of Neuroscience, Prof. Yossi Yovel and Prof. Amir Ayali, experts from the School of Zoology and the Sagol School of Neuroscience together with -, Dr. Anton Sheinin, Idan, Yoni Amit, and Neta Shavil. The results of the study were published in the prestigious journal Sensors.The researchers explain that at the beginning of the study, they sought to examine how the advantages of biological systems could be integrated into technological systems, and how the senses of dead locust could be used as sensors for a robot. “We chose the sense of hearing, because it can be easily compared to existing technologies, in contrast to the sense of smell, for example, where the challenge is much greater,” says Dr. Maoz. “Our task was to replace the robot’s electronic microphone with a dead insect’s ear, use the ear’s ability to detect the electrical signals from the environment, in this case vibrations in the air, and, using a special chip, convert the insect input to that of the robot.”To carry out this unique and unconventional task, the interdisciplinary team (Maoz, Yovel and Ayali) faced number of challenged. In the first stage the researchers built a robot capable of responding to signals it receives from the environment. Then, in a multidisciplinary collaboration, the researchers were able to isolate and characterize the dead locust ear and keep it alive, that is, functional, long enough to successfully connect it to the robot. In the final stage, the researchers succeeded in finding a way to pick up the signals received by the locust’s ear in a way that could be used by the robot. At the end of the process, the robot was able to “hear” the sounds and respond accordingly.“Prof. Ayali’s laboratory has extensive experience working with locusts, and they have developed the skills to isolate and characterize the ear,” explains Dr. Maoz. “Prof. Yovel’s laboratory built the robot and developed code that enables the robot to respond to electrical auditory signals. And my laboratory has developed a special device – Ear-on-a-Chip – that allows the ear to be kept alive throughout the experiment by supplying oxygen and food to the organ, while allowing the electrical signals to be taken out of the locust’s ear and amplified and transmitted to the robot.“In general, biological systems have a huge advantage over technological systems – both in terms of sensitivity and in terms of energy consumption. This initiative of Tel Aviv University researchers opens the door to sensory integrations between robots and insects – and may make much more cumbersome and expensive developments in the field of robotics redundant.“It should be understood that biological systems expend negligible energy compared to electronic systems. They are miniature, and therefore also extremely economical and efficient. For the sake of comparison, a laptop consumes about 100 watts per hour, while the human brain consumes about 20 watts a day. Nature is much more advanced than we are, so we should use it. The principle we have demonstrated can be used and applied to other senses, such as smell, sight and touch. For example, some animals have amazing abilities to detect explosives or drugs; the creation of a robot with a biological nose could help us preserve human life and identify criminals in a way that is not possible today. Some animals know how to detect diseases. Others can sense earthquakes. The sky is the limit.”###Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.
 Locust Swarm in AfricaEast Africa is seeing its worst swarms of locusts in many decades. … The locust invasion that swept over farms in rural Kenya from December 2019 has left farmers like Ndavu not only counting crop losses, but struggling with emerging environmental and health problems.Aug 7, 2020
The Biblical locust plagues of 2020 – BBC Futurewww.bbc.com › future › article › 20200806-the-biblical-…

Search for: Locust Swarm in Africa

OVER 60 LINKS OF DOCTORS EXPLAINING WHY VACCINES ARE NOT SAFE !


  1. Dr. Nancy Banks – http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm

  2. Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL

  3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s

  4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx

  5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – http://bit.ly/17sKDbf

  6. Dr. Larry Palevsky – http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6

  7. Dr. Toni Bark – http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB

  8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo

  9. Dr. Meryl Nass – http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc

  10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin – http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl

  11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot – http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL

  12. Dr. Robert Rowen – http://bit.ly/1SIELeF

  13. Dr. David Ayoub – http://bit.ly/1SIELve

  14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD – http://bit.ly/1KsdVby

  15. Dr. Rashid Buttar – http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6

  16. Dr. Roby Mitchell – http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU

  17. Dr. Ken Stoller – http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI

  18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein – http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH

  19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD – http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI

  20. Dr. David Davis – http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo

  21. Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych – http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J

  22. Dr. Harold E Buttram – http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df

  23. Dr. Kelly Brogan – http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ

  24. Dr. RC Tent – http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu

  25. Dr. Rebecca Carley – http://bit.ly/K49F4d

  26. Dr. Andrew Moulden – http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu

  27. Dr. Jack Wolfson – http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA

  28. Dr. Michael Elice – http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA

  29. Dr. Terry Wahls – http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd

  30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff – http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY

  31. Dr. Paul Thomas – http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf

  32. Many doctors talking at once – http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv

  33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz – censored

  34. Dr. Jane Orient – http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb

  35. Dr. Richard Deth – http://bit.ly/1GQDL10

  36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic – http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5

  37. Dr Chris Shaw – http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp

  38. Dr. Susan McCreadie – http://bit.ly/1CqqN83

  39. Dr. Mary Ann Block – http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX

  40. Dr. David Brownstein – http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A

  41. Dr. Jayne Donegan – http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz

  42. Dr. Troy Ross – censored

  43. Dr. Philip Incao – http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS

  44. Dr. Joseph Mercola – http://bit.ly/18dE38I

  45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet – http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC

  46. Dr. Robert Mendelson – http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr

  47. Dr. Theresa Deisher https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=6Bc6WX33SuE

  48. Dr. Sam Eggertsen-https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE
    Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren’t safe or effective, in these documentaries…

  49. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic – http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W

  50. The Greater Good – http://bit.ly/1icxh8j

  51. Shots In The Dark – http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h

  52. Vaccination The Hidden Truth – http://bit.ly/KEYDUh

  53. Vaccine Nation – http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU

  54. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines – http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU

  55. Lethal Injection – http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ

  56. Bought – http://bit.ly/1M7YSlr

  57. Deadly Immunity – http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z

  58. Autism – Made in the USA – http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5

  59. Beyond Treason – http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt

  60. Trace Amounts – http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv

  61. Why We Don’t Vaccinate – http://bit.ly/1KbXhuf
    9 hour court case
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DFTsd042M3o
    Documentaries…

  62. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic(2013)

  1. The Greater Good – (2011)
    https://youtu.be/VxR8XQHc0A0

  2. Shots In The Dark -(2009)
    http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h

  3. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -(1998)
    http://bit.ly/KEYDUh

  4. Vaccine Nation – (2008)
    https://youtu.be/bLk641P8CE4

  5. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines –
    http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU

  6. Lethal Injection – http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ

  7. Bought – (2015)
    https://youtu.be/HrgkKREhQrs
    https://youtu.be/_9nre8AMe5I

  8. Deadly Immunity – (2005)
    http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z

  9. Autism – Made in the USA(2009)

  1. Beyond Treason – (2005)
    http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt

  2. Trace Amounts – (2014)
    http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv

  3. Why We Don’t Vaccinate –
    https://youtu.be/WjiFrTnWiK4

  4. Autism Yesterday – (2010)
    http://bit.ly/1URU2A7
    Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx

Stockton’s Basic-Income Experiment Pays Off

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/03/stocktons-basic-income-experiment-pays-off/618174/

Two years ago, the city of Stockton, California, did something remarkable: It brought back welfare.

Using donated funds, the industrial city on the edge of the Bay Area tech economy launched a small demonstration program, sending payments of $500 a month to 125 randomly selected individuals living in neighborhoods with average incomes lower than the city median of $46,000 a year. The recipients were allowed to spend the money however they saw fit, and they were not obligated to complete any drug tests, interviews, means or asset tests, or work requirements. They just got the money, no strings attached.  

These kinds of cash transfers are a common, highly effective method of poverty alleviation used all over the world, in low-income and high-income countries, in rural areas and cities, and particularly for households with children. But not in the United States. The U.S. spends less of its GDP on what are known as “family benefits” than any other country in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, save Turkey. The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program spends less than one-fifth of its budget on direct cash aid, and its funding has been stuck at the same dollar amount since 1996—when the Clinton administration teamed up with congressional Republicans to turn it into a compulsory-work program. Those changes sliced into the safety net, allowing millions of people to fall through.   Most adults without children have no program to help them keep gas in the car and a roof over their head, no matter how poor they are. Most families with kids don’t have one either. In the United States, poverty is used as a cudgel to get people to work. We got rid of welfare for poor families’ and poor individuals’ own good, the argument goes. Give people money, and they stop working. They become dependent on welfare. They never sort out the problems in their life. The best route out of poverty is a hand up, not a handout.   

Stockton has now proved this false. An exclusive new analysis of data from the demonstration project shows that a lack of resources is its own miserable trap. The best way to get people out of poverty is just to get them out of poverty; the best way to offer families more resources is just to offer them more resources.

Derek Thompson: Busting the myth of ‘welfare makes people lazy’

The researchers Stacia Martin-West of the University of Tennessee and Amy Castro Baker of the University of Pennsylvania collected and analyzed data from individuals who received $500 a month and from individuals who did not. Some of their findings are obvious. The cash transfer reduced income volatility, for one: Households getting the cash saw their month-to-month earnings fluctuate 46 percent, versus the control group’s 68 percent. The families receiving the $500 a month tended to spend the money on essentials, including food, home goods, utilities, and gas. (Less than 1 percent went to cigarettes and alcohol.) The cash also doubled the households’ capacity to pay unexpected bills, and allowed recipient families to pay down their debts. Individuals getting the cash were also better able to help their families and friends, providing financial stability to the broader community.  

“It let me pay off some credit cards that I had been living off of, because my household income wasn’t large enough,” one recipient named Laura Kidd-Plummer told me. “It helped me to be able to take care of my groceries without having to run to the food bank three times a month. That was very helpful.” During the study, Laura also experienced a spell of homelessness when the apartment building she was living in had a fire. The Stockton cash helped her secure a new apartment, ensuring that she could afford movers and a security deposit.

The researchers also found that the guaranteed income did not dissuade participants from working—adding to a large body of evidence showing that cash benefits do not dramatically shrink the labor force and in some cases help people work by giving them the stability they need to find and take a new job. In the Stockton study, the share of participants with a full-time job rose 12 percentage points, versus five percentage points in the control group. In an interview, Martin-West and Castro Baker suggested that the money created capacity for goal setting, risk taking, and personal investment.“The big change was how it helped me see myself,” Tomas Vargas, another recipient, told me. “It was dead positive: I am an entrepreneur, I think of business ideas, I make business choices, I want to be financially stable.” When the program started, he worked in logistics. Now, in addition to nurturing his side projects, he is a case manager for individuals on parole.  

Zach Parolin: Welfare money is paying for a lot of things besides welfare

He noted that receiving the money had made him more civically and politically engaged, if also more infuriated at the country’s scorn toward low-income households. “It’s like it’s a big game,” he said. “These people are living with a silver spoon, talking—but how about you walk this life? Have you ever even seen it?”

Finally, the cash recipients were healthier, happier, and less anxious than their counterparts in the control group. “Cash is a better way to cure some forms of depression and anxiety than Prozac,” says Michael Tubbs, a former mayor of Stockton, who spearheaded the project. “So many of the illnesses we see in our community are a result of toxic stress and elevated cortisol levels and anxiety, directly attributed to income volatility and not having enough to cover your basic necessities. That’s true in the public-health crisis we’re in now.”

More work, less destitution, more family stability, less strained social networks, less stress, fewer incidences of homelessness, fewer skipped meals: This is what welfare could give the country.

And it just might. America’s welfare politics have shifted radically of late, in part because of the economic pressures felt by Millennials, the first generation in recent U.S. history likely to end up poorer than their parents. Two once-in-a-lifetime recessions, persistent wage stagnation, wild wealth and income inequality, the student-debt crisis, housing shortages, and a broader cost-of-living crisis have made redistributive policies much more palatable to them—and they’re now the country’s largest voting bloc. The pandemic has shifted U.S. welfare politics too, emphasizing the need for child-care benefits and demonstrating the power of cash as stimulus.

Right now, Democrats are pushing to send low- and middle-income parents $300 a month for each child younger than 6 and $250 a month for children ages 6 to 18 as part of President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus-relief package. The program would be temporary, but there is wide support for making it a permanent entitlement. Senator Mitt Romney, a Utah Republican, has put forward a proposal to eliminate TANF and replace it with a straightforward child allowance. A number of state, local, and nonprofit efforts are getting going too.

The Stockton demonstration project is ending. But a group Tubbs founded, called Mayors for a Guaranteed Income, is extending the initiative nationwide, with cities from Compton to Gary to Newark making plans to send low-income residents cash.

Mitre Corp – Inside America’s Secretive $2 Billion Research Hub – Collecting Fingerprints From Facebook, Hacking Smartwatches and Fighting Covid-19

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2020/07/13/inside-americas-secretive-2-billion-research-hub-collecting-fingerprints-from-facebook-hacking-smartwatches-and-fighting-covid-19/?sh=4241fc372052

Mitre Corp. runs some of the U.S. government’s most hush-hush science and tech labs. The cloak-and-dagger R&D shop might just be the most important organization you’ve never heard of.

Thomas Brewster06:30am EDT July 13, 2020


Whether it’s an invisible Aston Martin or an exploding pen, whenever James Bond needs a high-tech edge, he heads right for Q and his secretive MI6 lab. In the real world, American agents often rely on a less clandestine, but far better-funded group. Armed with 8,000 employees and an annual budget of between $1 billion and $2 billion of taxpayers’ money, Mitre Corp., a government-linked Skunk Works, has been making bleeding-edge breakthroughs for U.S. agencies for more than six decades. With its HQ housed in four towers atop a hill in McLean, Virginia, Mitre’s research centers employ some of the nation’s leading computer scientists and engineers to build digital tools for America’s top military, security and intelligence organizations.

Among the government’s wilder Mitre orders: a prototype tool that can hack into smartwatches, fitness trackers and home thermometers for the purposes of homeland security; software to collect human fingerprints from social media websites like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter for the FBI; support in building what the FBI calls the biggest database of human anatomy and criminal history in the world; and a study to determine whether someone’s body odor can show they’re lying.

These varied, multimillion-dollar projects, revealed in hundreds of pages of contract details obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, as well as interviews with former Mitre executives and government officials, provide just a glimpse into this sprawling contractor’s secretive world. Mitre’s influence goes far beyond its vast tech development; it’s also a major consultant for myriad government agencies on how best to deploy tech and policy strategies. Its latest gig: helping the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the CDC) and Homeland Security’s ominously named Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction office craft sweeping plans for curtailing the Covid-19 pandemic.

“If there’s a national security or public interest [problem], Mitre probably has a hand in it,” says former Mitre cybersecurity engineer Matt Edman. Bald, bearded and baritone-voiced, Edman could have worked at his pick of hot Silicon Valley tech companies, but instead focused his talents on challenging national security problems. During his time at Mitre, Edman partnered with the FBI, using his hacking skills to help take down the infamous Silk Road dark web drug bazaar. Shortly after he left Mitre, he was allowed to finish the job in October 2013, and was in Reykjavik, Iceland, alongside FBI agent Ilhwan Yum, to shutter the site run by the Dread Pirate Roberts (real name: Ross Ulbricht), who is now serving a life sentence. Edman was also at Mitre when it helped the FBI hack and monitor users of multiple child exploitation sites as part of Operation Torpedo, in what then attorney general Loretta Lynch hailed as a landmark dark web investigation.


“The prospect of law enforcement agencies being able to cheaply, easily and quickly obtain people’s fingerprints off of social media is extraordinarily chilling.”


Mitre’s history is full of such uncredited public service. As its promo material says: “You may not know it, but Mitre touches your life most every day.” Wanting to know the extent of Mitre’s touch, Forbes launched an investigation to pull Mitre’s staggering range of work from the shadows. What we found is an elite institute that has proved a major boon to the U.S. government, providing tools for surveillance of criminals, diseases and immigrants illegally trying to enter the country. But some of the same projects are setting off alarm bells among human rights organizations and privacy advocates like the ACLU, which are concerned about surveillance overreach from Mitre’s sophisticated technology. Despite multiple requests to meet with Mitre executives in person and visit its headquarters, Mitre declined to provide comment for this article. The FBI and DHS acknowledged requests for comment but have not provided any.

Few have heard of Mitre or know its mission, despite its vital importance to the security of the nation. Even locals who live near its large office complex often have no idea it’s been such a stalwart supporter of American national security and defense over the last six decades. “It was just miles away from where I was living and had been there since the mid-50s,” says Shawn Valle, who went to the campus for the first time for a job interview in 2008. “I’d never heard of it.” Valle ended up working on cybersecurity for the Air Force and looking for security issues in Google’s Android operating system during his five years there.

While out of the public eye, Mitre’s history is remarkable. The nonprofit company was born out of the Cold War, spun out of perhaps the world’s most famous tech campus, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (The MIT acronym provides Mitre the first half of its name). In the late 1950s, facing the threat of a Soviet nuclear strike, the U.S. Air Force called on MIT to help it create an air defense system that would help it detect incoming bombers. The institute came up with the Semi-Automated Ground Environment (SAGE). The system combined radar, radio and network communications to detect incoming enemy aircraft, alert and continually update nearby Air Force bases, which would scramble jets to intercept approaching threats. It was the first air defense system of its kind in America, and Mitre was founded by MIT administrators in 1958 to manage SAGE and its future development.


“DHS has asked Mitre to help build an enduring national capability to contain Covid-19.”


Over the next 40 years, Mitre was behind the scenes of now-famous air surveillance technologies such as the Airborne Warning and Communications Systems (AWACS) and the Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (STARS). It also played a significant role in the development of much-used tech like GPS and the commercial airline Traffic Collision Avoidance System. Today its remit is even wider, leading all manner of cybersecurity initiatives and healthcare projects, while sticking to its core role of protecting national security.

“The characteristic of Mitre that I’ve always explained to people is that when we say we do information sciences, we go way beyond what people would typically call IT,” Martin Faga, the Mitre CEO from 2000 to 2006, tells Forbes. It would, for example, design a specialized antenna to go on military aircraft to send and receive data from a communication satellite, says Faga, a white-haired, suitably inconspicuous longtime employee of U.S. intelligence agencies and contractors. Mitre would then design the satellite communications system, too, as well as the radar—basically “every kind of information system,” he adds.

Its broad expertise is now being employed to help yank America out of its Covid-19 crisis. In a $16.3 million contract signed with the CDC in late June, Mitre was asked to help build “an enduring national capability to contain Covid-19.” The CDC, which spent $20 million with Mitre on disease surveillance tech and services in 2019, hadn’t responded to Forbes’ requests for more detail on those pandemic plans. Meanwhile, on March 17, four days into the national emergency caused by Covid-19, the DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) office called on Mitre to effectively act as a fulcrum of a pandemic response plan, to “engage, inform and guide” mayors, governors and emergency response leaders dealing with a pandemic. Mitre would also create disease models to track a pandemic and determine what “nonpharmaceutical interventions” (a.k.a. NPIs—think closing schools, stores and implementing social distancing) could help lawmakers “bend the curve.”

Mitre’s Moola


Government data shows taxpayer dollars directed to Mitre have been rising in recent years, heading toward $2 billion. Mitre says its overall revenue for 2019 was $1.8 billion.

The $200,000 contract (microscopic by Covid spending standards) states: “As the pandemic progresses, the contractor will identify, collect and analyze data to enable near real-time learning to state and local leaders for the eventual appropriate retrograde of NPI implementation efforts.” In other words, Mitre is helping America’s leaders decide when and how to open up again. (Neither Mitre nor the DHS explained why the CWMD unit was managing such a contract.) And pro bono, Mitre has created a contact tracing system called Sara Alert that’s been helping various states—Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Vermont, to name a few—monitor outbreaks. The system lets people known to be at risk of Covid-19 infection to upload their symptoms and temperature to their state and local health bodies’ databases. In Arkansas, 12,861 have enrolled since early April, updating the health department via text, call, email or website on their condition. “This system allows us to more readily identify secondary cases, really establishing a better handle on social clusters, which has been a challenge,” says Dr. Mike Cima, chief epidemiologist at the Arkansas Department of Health. It’s been so successful, Cima plans to carry on using Sara Alert for other infectious diseases beyond Covid-19’s eventual demise.

Mitre differs from other military and intelligence contractors in that it has no mandate to make any money. Unlike commercial contractors like Northrup Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics, it runs seven of those Skunk Works, known in the industry as “federally funded research and development centers” (FFDRCs), a mundane name belying their influential work. Mitre only charges for employees’ time, with a small fee, usually around 3% of the overall cost, that supports further independent research, says Faga. “People come forward with a great idea and say, ‘Gee, if I had $100,000, I could turn this into something great.’ And the company can give it to them.”

This put the former CEO in an unusual position among his Beltway rivals. “I’d go to the annual meeting of the board. I go to my report and say, ‘We worked hard this year. And we broke even.’ And they’d all cheer. Any other CEO would hear, ‘You’re fired!’”

Mitre doesn’t commercialize the technology it creates. Once a prototype is built, it’s licensed to either the government, private business or academic institutions. Since 2014, it’s transferred more than 670 licenses to industry and university partners.

Unshackled from commercial pressures, Mitre’s given latitude to develop some of the more radical answers to the government’s most pressing questions. Take a project to collect fingerprints from peoples’ Facebook, Twitter and other social media posts. Emails and details of a Mitre contract obtained by Forbes outline a $500,000 “social media image fingerprinting project” for the FBI, which started in 2015. It was run by an FBI hacking unit in Quantico, the Operational Technology Division, and funded by a previously unreported research funding body called Triad. Chris Piehota, the recently retired chief that Triad was designed to fund innovative research from objective outside bodies and that “image fingerprinting” is as literal as it sounds: trying to capture biometric information from social media images. Think of gang members who put up photos of themselves online, making gang signs with their hands, explains Piehota. “They’re also giving us access to their fingerprint patterns,” he adds. “[The FBI] can take your fingerprint characteristics from those images and they can build fingerprint files or fingerprint characteristics for individuals [for whom] we don’t have biographic information.” This could be useful for individuals violating immigration laws where the U.S. doesn’t have a record of their fingerprints in another database, adds Piehota. It could also be used to identify someone in a child exploitation video or, as in an investigation in the Welsh city of Swansea, catch drug dealers using tools like WhatsApp.


“Think of people crossing the U.S.-Mexico border and a surveillance tool that can detect smartwatches and hack them.”


The technology, if it works as described, is potentially useful for the law enforcement and intel agencies Mitre works with, and potentially dangerous for personal privacy. Nate Wessler, staff attorney at the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, says the surveillance project raises “serious privacy concerns,” especially during a time of pan-American civil unrest over the Covid-19 pandemic and racial inequality. “Nobody expects that by posting a digital photo online, they are exposing their unique biometric identifiers including their fingerprints, to collection in a law enforcement database,” he says. “Not only are we seeing historic protests against anti-Black racism and police brutality, but we’re also seeing historic levels of digital recordings of those photos of those protesters by the media and by law enforcement. . . . The prospect of law enforcement agencies being able to cheaply, easily and quickly obtain people’s fingerprints off of those photos is extraordinarily chilling.” Piehota notes that as a privacy precaution the FBI would only take fingerprints from social media images where the target was a valid suspect and it wouldn’t simply trawl the likes of Facebook for all available prints.

Mitre has a history in assisting the U.S. government’s expansion of biometric surveillance. Another 2014 contract details Mitre’s work assisting the FBI on facial recognition tools, right down to “creating local watch lists by flagging subjects of interest.” It’s also helping the FBI build the Next Generation Identification (NGI) system, which is one of the biggest databases of criminal suspects’ faces, fingerprints and other identifying body parts on the planet. According to the FBI, the NGI is “the world’s largest and most efficient electronic repository of biometric and criminal history information.” It’s cost the FBI at least $500 million since its incipience in 2007, much of it going to early developer Lockheed Martin, according to a review of contract records. Piehota says that all manner of law enforcement agencies, from local to federal, can access it to check the identity and background of a criminal. And Mitre, since at least 2013, has received millions in contracts to provide technology and guidance to build it as part of a previously unreported project called “Sugar Bowl II,” an unexplained code name, FOIA records show.

Mitre’s high-tech snooping also extends to the fast-growing world of connected devices: Think smartwatches, speakers, TVs and security cameras. In a $500,000 September 2017 contract, the DHS asked Mitre to create a system that could locate and hack into smartwatches, fitness trackers, home automation devices or anything that could be classed as an Internet of Things (IoT) system. The contract says the tech could be used either by law enforcement or border officials to help them “rapidly detect and exploit for evidentiary purposes IoT devices in a security or crime scene environment,” or for use at “physical security boundaries” to hack into devices “passing through or approaching the boundary.” Think of people crossing the U.S.-Mexico border and a surveillance tool that scans every device coming through, checking which ones are smartwatches or other IoT systems. When one is worn by a criminal suspect, it could quickly be drained of data and evidence of their activities gathered, from their text messages to their previous locations.

One source, a former police officer and surveillance industry expert who claimed knowledge of the contract, says the tech was only ever used by Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Another source, a former Mitre and government employee, says Mitre has long provided digital forensics expertise to CBP staff carrying out searches of electronic devices at the border. And FOIA-obtained contracts worth more than $13 million show Mitre has provided expansive CBP technical support since at least 2016, including a study of the efficacy of Rapid DNA technology—another controversial tool that’s led to an outcry among civil rights organizations, who say the tools infringe on immigrants’ privacy. Designed to help uncover immigrants lying about being related to each other at the border, it can quickly determine whether people entering the U.S. are related. As the government cannot legally detain migrant children for longer than 20 days, they’re typically released before an immigration court hearing and ICE has claimed this is being used as a loophole to smuggle children into the country.

The power to hack into smart IoT devices could be hugely advantageous for federal agents, though the government wouldn’t tell Forbes where or how it’s been deployed. As explained in the September 2017 project outline, police have been lacking in the skills and resources to acquire evidence from these kinds of technologies. “IoT devices capture a lot of telemetry and I can imagine lots of places where this is useful,” says Jake Williams, a former NSA analyst turned cybersecurity practitioner, who adds that he was shocked that such a tool would be used at border checkpoints. It’s got civil rights lawyers spooked too. “It would appear to only require the person using the tools to be in range of the device signals and would not require physical possession or access,” says Jerome Greco, a public defender in the Digital Forensics Unit of the Legal Aid Society. “Law enforcement use would be troubling, and it would be difficult to hold them accountable for how they use it.”

Mitre isn’t just helping the government interrogate tech; it’s done some work on human interrogation, too. Going back to 2009, the year when the Homeland Security-funded Mitre lab—the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and Development Institute—was founded, some more left-field work was being undertaken in a study dubbed “Human Odor as a Biometric for Deception.” In research reminiscent of the left-field projects more often associated with the CIA, Homeland Security set out to see whether there was any scientific basis to the saying “I think I smell a rat.” Its aim was to investigate the possibility of using the “human odor signature” as an “indicator for deception.” Samples were taken from volunteers before and after they committed or didn’t commit some deceptive act to see whether or not there was a difference. They also wanted to find evidence to “support the hypothesis that an individual’s odor signature can serve as a biometric identifier.” The essential question was: Do you have an odor that is entirely unique to you when you lie? Yes, was the answer, according to Homeland Security, which hadn’t responded to other inquiries about Mitre’s operations. In the executive summary of their final report in 2011, the authors said the “results indicate that measurable variations in human odor do seem to permit differentiating between deceptive and nondeceptive individuals.”

This may be an example of Mitre’s more outré research, much of which remains stored in the vaults of those McLean towers or locked up under classified seals in government servers. But such is its standing, even when the value of the work is doubted, Mitre’s name is enough for it to be taken seriously within the halls of government. Faga, the former CEO who remains on an advisory board at Mitre, recalls a recent trip to the Pentagon, where a meeting had been called to discuss worrying vulnerabilities in GPS. A delegate anxious to know just how worried they should be about the security weaknesses asked where the Pentagon got the information. When an official said Mitre, the atmosphere in the room changed, says Faga. Everyone, adds Faga, concluded, “Okay, well, then it’s real.”