39. Pricing for efficiency. On efficiency grounds water should be considered a different product depending on i) the location where it is produced and consumed, on ii) its quality including the effects water or sewage quality has on parties other than the consumer, and on iii) the time of day or year when it is supplied and consumed. For example, consumer demand and therefore willingness-to-pay may be high at certain times (peak periods) of the day or it may be high during dry seasons when plants need extra watering. The cost of supplying water obviously depend on the desired quality of water, the costs of transportation and the total volume to be transported at any given time.
BREAKING: PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM – U.S.A. WATER from SEWERS and SALT WATER a DEADLYPLAN of GENOCIDE
Trump said in Arizona during a swing through Western states. “I hope you enjoy the water that you’re going to have.”
While you will read this as a United States Plan – it is a Worldwide plan of death by Water Deception!
EXCERPTS and INSIDER COMMENTS from the 10/19/2018 White House WATER MEMORANDUM:
FIRST, don’t be fooled by the title of the memorandum – Promoting Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the WEST,
this memorandum is NOT at all what the title implies.
We are being told that Decades of uncoordinated, piece meal regulatory actions have diminished the ability of our Federal infrastructure todeliver water in an efficient, cost-effective way.
Ok – Lets break this down. The Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Commerce are to be provided with proposals reducing and streamlining regulations and procedures that burden the water infrastructure challenges in the western United States. “Burden” means to unnecessarily obstruct, delay, curtail, impede or otherwise impose significant costs on the permitting, utilization, transmission, delivery, or supply of water resources and infrastructure.
This memorandum creates deadlines for actions and some deadlines are required by
January 31, 2019.
NOTE: Why the memorandum deadline rush by 1/31/2019, today being 10/19/2018? While this rush may sound like action is finally being taken you will learn that the actions are aimed at serving up toxic water to the public, fish and all else whose survival depends on water, and throwing unimaginable sums of money at these killer water DEPLOYMENTS using sewer wastewater treatment and water desalination.
WE ARE BEING TRICKED by NOT reading and understanding what the CEO of USA, Inc. is really saying.
The Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Executive Office of the President shall be given regular updates from the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce on the PROGRESS of MONITORING WATER SUPPLIES and ADVANCING WATER DELIVERIES, rapidly.
The president, also, wants improved weather research and forecasting of water availability. Really? Do you think he does NOT know about the Geoengineering OPERATION which is the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the Earth’s climate? He Knows!
The memorandum requires water experts and resource managers to develop an action plan related to water availability and water infrastructure projects. NO MENTION OF PRIMARY WATER – which is a clean renewable God given water resource. Please watch the YouTube video “Primary Water Explained”, and maybe the president needs to watch this, too. He must know about Primary Water. After all USA, Inc. and NATO blew up the Great Man-made River Project in Libya, the 8th Wonder of the WORLD, which delivered primary water to many people in Libya, for free!
The CEO of USA, Inc. memorandum wants improved use of technology to INCREASE water reliability to the maximum extent possible by using reclaimed, recycled SEWER water for drinking along with expensive desalination projects where the sludge will create hazardous environmental ramifications. Further, investments ($$$) are to be made to rapidly deliver sewer water and to REDUCE regulatory burdens to enable broader scales of deployment of the toxic water to ALL.
Investments are to be made in “water management” by using real-time, all the time water monitoring of “wildlife” and water deliveries where every drop of water extracted will be monitored. This monitoring requirement is the (AMI) Advanced Metering Infracturce, aka, Wireless SMART Meters. These wireless water meters will further add another layer of frequencies of death in all our communities. Also, these meters will track and limit water consumption based upon restrictions imposed in ground water allotment and usage schemes. See (c) of the memorandum for the wildlife quote above. You may wonder why monitoring wildlife would be included in the memorandum. We will leave that up to you to consider.
As outlined in the memorandum these NEW speedy policies to promote reliable water supplies and monitored deliveries to Amerika WEST is clearly centralized privatization of all water resources, and the poisoning of drinking water through technologies that are designed to cause sickness and death!
So, when you read in the memorandum, “work together to minimize unnecessary regulatory burdens and foster more efficient decision-making so that water projects are better able to meet the demands of their authorized purposes” – think about it! What are their authorized purposes? Reducing the population, by imposing water technologies that are TOXIC, COSTLY and DEADLY? Remember, treated sewer wastewater contains contaminants of emerging concern and known pharmaceutical poisons.
NOW THIS BRINGS THIS DIABOLICAL MEMORANDUM BACK TO TRUMPS QUOTE – WHEREIN HE STATED,
“I HOPE YOU ENJOY THE WATER THAT YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE”.
We have available to us safe, pure, clean and renewable water, called Primary Water. Learn more – go to: PrimaryWater.org and listen to the video Primary Water Explained.
Operation Crimson Mist,
Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda
Spooks now use technology in Baghdad that was “proven” on one-million dead Africans
By Joe Vialls
May 29, 2003
Original title: American Mind Control in Baghdad
Operation Crimson Mist
During the late afternoon of 6 April 1994, a hail of cannon shells tore through the fuselage of a
commercial airliner flying overhead central Rwanda. Several seconds later the blazing plane
exploded on impact with the ground, killing President Habyarimana of Rwanda, President
Ntaryamira of Burundi, and most of their senior government officials. In that fatal millisecond of
time, the entire political command structure of central Africa was decapitated, leaving the way open
for “Operation Crimson Mist”, the most obscene terminal mind control experiment ever mounted
by the United States of America against a sovereign nation. That “Crimson Mist” has been used
again recently on a smaller scale in Iraq, is now beyond doubt.
Forced into a mental health facility for talking about 5G with her family doctor
Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
An utterly remarkable and disturbing situation has transpired in the UK just in the last 3-4 days. Susanne Small (her Facebook name; see her posted FB video) was detained under the UK’s Mental Health Act on Monday because, during a recent visit to her GP, the doctor had determined she was a risk either to herself or others. On Tuesday, she appeared in a special segment of the Richie Allen show, which is linked to below (30 minutes). It’s well worth listening to.
Activists are familiar with Susanne’s concerns over the health effects of 5G technology and its quiet rollout. We’re also familiar with other topics she raises such as Agenda 21/2030, the work of Debra Tavares, etc. This is clearly someone who has done relevant research and, as we are fond of saying, ‘gone down the rabbit hole’.
As you’ll hear in the interview with Allen, done via her smartphone from the actual hospital, she had compiled research on 5G and gone down to her doctor’s office with it, without an appointment at 8am, presumably when the office had just opened. She believed that certain symptoms she had been getting, such as headaches, might be connected to cell towers, and had noticed a new large one had been installed in the neighborhood, although she was well aware that it wouldn’t have been operational at the time. The reaction from the doctor and staff was to basically send her on her way but leave the information behind, which she refused to do. During the subsequent consultation with her doctor, Susanne had the feeling that it was wise to leave, that the doctor had absolutely no interest in the research and viewed her as someone who was under a lot of stress.
A day later she experienced phone calls with withheld caller ID and had someone call on her at home. She refused to answer the door, and it was a day later – probably two days after the visit to the doctor – that police and mental health professionals arrived to detain her at a mental health facility.
This is what the UK government’s site, on the page titled Mental Health Act, says about being forcibly ‘sectioned’ or detained under it: People detained under the Mental Health Act need urgent treatment for a mental health disorder and are at risk of harm to themselves or others. Further down, it says:
Who decides that someone should be detained?
An emergency is when someone seems to be at serious risk of harming themselves or others. This can occur:
in private premises – police have powers to enter your home, if need be by force, under a Section 135 warrant. You may then be taken to a place of safety for an assessment by an approved mental health professional and a doctor. You can be kept there until the assessment is completed, up to a maximum of 72 hours.
in a public place – if the police find you in a public place and you appear to have a mental disorder and are in need of immediate care or control, they can take you to a place of safety (usually a hospital or sometimes the police station) and detain you there under Section 136. You will then be assessed by an approved mental health professional and a doctor. You can be kept there until the assessment is completed, up to a maximum of 72 hours
Notice how your home may be forcibly entered. Susanne had wrongly believed she was safe in her own home. The page also says that a person will be assessed and confined for up to 72 hours, but she may also be detained for up to 28 days under Section 2:
The length of time you could be detained depends on the type of mental health condition you have and your personal circumstances at the time. You could be detained for:
up to 28 days under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act
up to six months under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, with further renewals
She is, however, hoping to be out by tomorrow (Friday), as she reports in the interview posted below.
It seems she had bombarded her doctor with information, probably too much as she readily admits. The mental health team had asked her about Donald Trump, whom she must have mentioned to her GP. Laughingly, she jokes to Richie, “thank God I didn’t mention MK Ultra!”. Probably it was also unwise to rush down to the office without an appointment. But as she correctly observes, even if an activist is using – unknowingly – what amounts to fake news or false information, that is still no indicator of questionable mental health.
Small is clearly informed, lucid and has a strong character. A UK doctor friend observed to me after listening to the interview below that while the GP had probably been overloaded with information, Small doesn’t sound like any sort of risk. Of an activist mindset, Small isn’t someone who is likely to back down. She’s been professionally employed for many years as she notes, and correctly observes that if it can happen to her, it can happen to anybody.
2014 Napa earthquake may be linked to groundwater changes, study says
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
JUN 14, 2018 |2:00 AM
Research suggests the magnitude 6.0 earthquake that rocked California wine country in 2014 may have been caused by an expansion of Earth’s crust because of seasonally receding groundwater under the Napa and Sonoma valleys.
The vineyard-filled valleys flank the West Napa Fault, which produced the quake that killed one person, injured several hundred and caused more than $500 million in losses.
The study recently published in the American Geophysical Union’s “Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth” suggests land between the valleys is stretched each summer as groundwater levels fall beneath the valleys and the ground in the valleys sinks and contracts.
The amount of the horizontal stretching measured is tiny — about 0.12 inch — but enough to stress faults, according to the researchers.
“We think it’s more of a localized effect, something related to the groundwater system. We don’t know if it is groundwater pumping specifically, or something related to how the natural aquifer system works, or a combination,” said lead author Meredith Kraner, formerly of the Department of Geosciences at Stony Brook University in New York and now with the University of Nevada, Reno.
Co-authors were William E. Holt of Stony Brook University and Adrian A. Borsa of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.
The early morning Napa quake on Aug. 24 was the largest to hit the Bay Area since the magnitude 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake on Oct. 17, 1989.
The Napa quake left 8 miles of surface rupture and damaged many historical masonry buildings and older residences, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.