That fact that so many of them took enormous sums of money to demonize carbon dioxide (
Of course people like Ohio State University's Professor Lonnie Thomson (adviser to Al Gore's movie) didn't have access to the computer modelers data - and neither did anyone else. But the fact that
should have caught someone's attention.
We cannot support bogus "political" science - coming out of Washington in the form of grants and loans
- now being used as a reason to force us to accept dangerous Smart Meters and the so-called Smart Grid. It is a shame the environmental orgs aren't investigating EMR and frequencies as well as Schumann's Resonance and its importance to both human life and wildlife
. They should be helping us fight the devastation the Smart Grid will cause - instead of promoting it!
They have lost all credibility!
Sixteen prestigious scientists even managed to get their objections to the CO2 global warming nonsense printed in the New York Times in Jan, 2012:
No Need to Panic About Global Warming
Speaking for many scientists and engineers who have looked carefully and independently at the science of climate, we have a message to any candidate for public office: There is no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to "decarbonize" the world's economy. Even if one accepts the inflated climate forecasts of the IPCC, aggressive greenhouse-gas control policies are not justified economically.
There are now many around the country seeking ways to make the local 'government' employees culpable for signing loan and/or grant obligations
based on bogus science. 31,000+ scientists
is nothing to scoff at! The terms fraud and ultra vires comes to mind. Each loan and/or grant requires someone's signature. That someone is the responsible party, because in our current economic climate paying back these loans might become very difficult.