END the LIE . . . Environmental organizations have lost all credibility! They should not be allowed to even talk to local 'government' employees!

ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

That fact that so many of them took enormous sums of money to demonize carbon dioxide (without validating the science or the IPCC Delphi Technique process of creating a false consensus) is reason enough. 

Of course people like Ohio State University's Professor Lonnie Thomson (adviser to Al Gore's movie) didn't have access to the computer modelers data - and neither did anyone else. But the fact that 31,000+ American scientists disagree with the theory should have caught someone's attention. 

Global Warming Computer Models Collapse
Thank God, finally the bogus compute models have collapsed!
Excerpt: 
For political reasons that have nothing to do with science or reality, certain globalist operatives needed to convince the world's populations that doomsday was coming if they didn't reduce carbon dioxide emissions. But in order to pull this off, these operatives first needed to demonize carbon dioxide, the single most important nutrient on the planet for reforestation, plant growth, food production and "greening" the planet. [via the carbon dioxide - oxygen cycle]

We cannot support bogus "political" science - coming out of Washington in the form of grants and loans - now being used as a reason to force us to accept dangerous Smart Meters and the so-called Smart Grid. It is a shame the environmental orgs aren't investigating EMR and frequencies as well as Schumann's Resonance and its importance to both human life and wildlife. They should be helping us fight the devastation the Smart Grid will cause - instead of promoting it! 
They have lost all credibility!

Sixteen prestigious scientists even managed to get their objections to the CO2 global warming nonsense printed in the New York Times in Jan, 2012: 

No Need to Panic About Global Warming
Speaking for many scientists and engineers who have looked carefully and independently at the science of climate, we have a message to any candidate for public office: There is no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to "decarbonize" the world's economy. Even if one accepts the inflated climate forecasts of the IPCC, aggressive greenhouse-gas control policies are not justified economically. 

There are now many around the country seeking ways to make the local 'government' employees culpable for signing loan and/or grant obligations based on bogus science. 31,000+ scientists is nothing to scoff at! The terms fraud and ultra vires comes to mind. Each loan and/or grant requires someone's signature. That someone is the responsible party, because in our current economic climate paying back these loans might become very difficult. 

Best,
AL
PeopleforSafeTechnologies