This free script provided by
Water War Amid Brazil Drought Leads to Fight Over Puddles
Sao Paulo state leaders want to tap Jaguari, which feeds Rio de Janeiro’s main source. Rio state officials say they shouldn’t suffer for others’ mismanagement. Supreme Court judges have summoned the parties to Brasilia for a mediation session this week.
The standoff in a nation with more water resources than any other country in the world portends further conflicts as the planet grows increasingly urban. One in three of the world’s 100 biggest cities is under water stress, according to The Nature Conservancy, a U.S.-based nonprofit.
Even so, Sao Paulo has resisted restrictions that states like California have enforced, including prohibiting restaurants from serving water except when asked and allowing homeowners to water lawns only on specified days.
California drought hits San Mateo County coast particularly hard - San Francisco Chronicle
Remember, the Earth is the water planet and makes water continuously. We have an abundance of water and are being tricked into a false belief system to make money from our ignorance and lack of understanding how the water cycle really works and where water originates. . . The international bankers and other corporate agencies make HUGH profits from our willingness to believe false science. . .
Please share the TRUTH with all you know and contact ALL ranchers and farmers and warn them what The Report From Iron Mountain told us "the biggest land theft in the United States and Global history is underway" . . .
U.S. House approves bill to remake California water law
Sixteen Things Libya Will Never See Again
Jerry Brown in California signs groundwater legislation
“It is unfortunate that the governor felt compelled to sign this groundwater management scheme that was hastily cobbled together without regard to historical legal precedent and private property water rights,” state Sen. Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, said in a prepared statement. “Californians who rely on groundwater will now have to deal with not only new and unaccountable government agencies that will police water usage; they will be at the mercy of these faceless bureaucrats who will impose unknown fees and fines.”
Groundwater makes up about 40 percent of all fresh water consumed in California in average years, and far more in drought years.
Brown said public attention on the drought focused the Legislature on water. He called the drought the “overarching context that allows a lot of action that has taken place in Sacramento.”
PG&E (Rothschild) "Owns" a Primary Water Source in Northern California . . .
The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) acquired the hydroelectric complex and accompanying Eel River water rights in1930=-~-o,L, the Snow Mountain Water~.*.*u... ~ Power Compa.ny Water rights for PG&E on the Eel River consisted of all flows except a minimum of 2 cfs released from Cape Horn Dam at all times for downstream water users.
PG&E has applied for a new 50-year license (April 1970) that proposed to maintain existing operational procedures for the project.
In April of 1972, the FPC license issued to Snow Mountain Water and Power Company expired. PG&E has continued operations of the project (FPC 77) under annual renewals of their old license. One month before the license expired, the Department of Fish and Game submitted a report (Anderson, 1972) to the FPC recommending that certain flow releases and . . . (Read more from the link above)
Since 1972, the Department of Fish and Game has conducted two investigations (Department of Fish and Game, 1972 and 1975)
which included temperature and instream studies to recommend the minimum instream flows and the operational alternative best suited to the preservation of fish and wildlife (for a further description of the operationa! alternatives reviewed, see Cape Horn Case Study Report No. 14).
WATER MAP - Tracking and Monitoring How California Water Agencies Are Responding to Record-Dry Conditions
WATER WARS in the US: Injection Wells: The Poison Beneath Us
Excerpt from above link:
There are more than 680,000 underground waste and injectionwells nationwide, more than 150,000 of which shoot industrial fluids thousands of feet below the surface. Scientists and federal regulators acknowledge they do not know how many of the sites are leaking.
In interviews, several key experts acknowledged that the idea that injection is safe rests on science that has not kept pace with reality, and on oversight that doesn't always work.
"In 10 to 100 years we are going to find out that most of our groundwater is polluted," said Mario Salazar, an engineer who worked for 25 years as a technical expert with the EPA's underground injection program in Washington. "A lot of people are going to get sick, and a lot of people may die."
EARTHQUAKES: Hazard Associated with Deep Well Injection - Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
COMMENT: The perfect earthquake, "fingerprintless" and deliberate! Think about this - maximize profits by using the earth as an invisible internal dump site by injecting toxic waste underground. Under certain circumstances some of the injection sites cause earthquakes. Big profits are made due to the deliberate damage caused by earthquakes and the cost required for reconstruction of damaged infrastructure . . . Plus, the savings by disposing manufacturing chemical wastes into the ground versus LEGAL disposal . . The Perfect Crime. . .
This report discloses facts that have been CONCEALED from the public . . . Furthermore, can we fully reLIE upon a report like this to represent REAL scientific data? Particularly, when this report discusses impacts of water loads due to reservoirs that this report says causes earthquakes? If indeed reservoirs for water storage cause earthquakes, this finding would lend to the acceptance of dam removal, which doesn't add up when you think of ALL the lakes i.e. Great Lakes (water reservoirs), in the United States that store water, collect surface water run-off and increase the ground water supply . . . Keep in mind we are finding that MOST scientific reports are based upon consensus science and NOT real science. This is Criminal Science which is profiting the bankers that are creating 'markets" out of intentional and deliberate redefining of REAL factually based data. Science has been for sale, for profits, for control and to enslave the populations through corporate statutes, rules and ordinances to enforce criminal policies based upon false science with criminal intent. Keep in mind - the global warming science is another consensus based science created to further profit the bankers and enslave the people. .
It is possible this report was crafted as a cover for the seismic damages caused by injection wells by falsely blaming the impacts of damages caused by water reservoir storage. .
The profit driven bankers have been "vaccinating" the earth with LETHAL injection wells, and have Plans to privatize the PUBLIC water supply. Their strategy will drive public water resources into private hands, a partnership launched quietly in January 2012 at the World Economic Forum. They plan to establish water governance that put the private sector in the driver's seat in water management and control . . and create a global water "market", wherein they sell our water back to us . . The international bankers are seizing public water resources under the cloak of many corporate government agencies such as the EPA, Army Corp of Engineers, Dept. of Interior, The World Bank, VEOLIA (Rothschild), Nestle, Coca-Cola, GE, and more, along with our local state and corporate governments. It makes sense that the international bankers would benefit by reducing access to water resources creating the fear of seismic destruction.
CAUTION - THIS REPORT MAY HAVE BEEN PRODUCED TO REDIRECT EARTHQUAKE LIABILITY OF INJECTION WELLS TO RESERVOIR WATER STORAGE . . . AGAIN, THIS REPORT IS LIKELY FLAWED AND CREATED BY CONSENSUS SCIENCE - TO DISGUISE THE REAL NATURE OF THE PROBLEM . . . WHAT WE DO KNOW IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A CORPORATION AND DOES NOT SERVE THE PEOPLE.
Excerpts from above link:
Within the United States, injection of fluid into deep wells has triggered documented earthquakes in Colorado, Texas, New York, New Mexico, Nebraska, and Ohio and possibly in Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Inves- tigations of these cases have led to some understanding of the probable physical mechanism of the triggering and of the criteria for predicting whether future earthquakes will be triggered, based on the local state of stress in the Earth's crust, the injection pressure, and the physical and the hydrological properties of the rocks into which the fluid is being injected.
APPENDIX B - SUMMARY OF RESERVOIR-INDUCED SEISMICITY
Unlike injection operations that only affect pore pressure, the presence of a large reservoir modifies the environment in several ways. First, the large mass of the reservoir represents a large increase in the imposed load, which increases the in situ elastic stresses. The load of water also affects the pore pressure directly (by the infiltration of the reservoir water and subsequent raising of the water table) and indirectly (through the closure of water- saturated pores and fractures in the rock beneath the reservoir load). This coupling between the elastic and the fluid effects in the rock, as well as the poorly understood response of inhomogeneities in material and hydrologic properties of the rock to changes in stress induced by the reservoir load, make modeling the impact of reservoirs much more difficult than for cases of fluid injection (Simpson, 1986a). Nevertheless, there are enough similar- ities between injection- and reservoir-induced earthquakes that they both provide a number of constraints on the mechanism of triggered seismicity.
Although the magnitude of the net pore pressure change produced by reservoir impoundment is often considerably less than at many fluid injection sites, the larger physical dimensions of the reservoirs allows their influence to extend over much broader areas.
AGAIN CAUTION - THIS REPORT MAY HAVE BEEN PRODUCED TO REDIRECT EARTHQUAKE LIABILITY OF INJECTION WELLS TO RESERVOIR WATER STORAGE . . . AGAIN, THIS REPORT IS LIKELY FLAWED AND CREATED BY CONSENSUS SCIENCE - TO DISGUISE THE REAL NATURE OF THE PROBLEM . . . WHAT WE DO KNOW IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A CORPORATION AND DOES NOT SERVE THE PEOPLE.
TO LEARN MORE GO TO - wwwStopTheCrime.net to the USA, Inc. link and watch or read "The Iron Mountain Report" . . Senate Report 93-549 and "The Great American Adventure - Secrets of America" by retired Federal Judge Dale - all free downloads from www.StopTheCrime.net or google search . ..
Drought hits towns hard; days from being without water (TEXAS)
Secretary-General of the United Nations . . . HIDES the Real Scientific Facts of the WORLD . . Facts NOT Told
Secretary-General of the United Nations . . . HIDES the Real Scientific Facts of the WORLD . . He LIES
"Few global issues are more important than the environment and climate change. Since taking office, I have consistently emphasized the dangers of global warming, the environmental degradation, the loss of biodiversity and the potential for conflict growing out of competition over dwindling natural resources such as water - the topics which are analysed in the GEO-4 report. Dealing with these issues is the great moral, economic and social imperative of our time."
– Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-4)1 report, October 2007, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Water Wars by Janet Phelan NOW living in Exile for What She Discovered . . . . did you know this?
The WORLD BANK: New MAP and Report Identifies Major Clean-Tech Market Opportunity for Small Businesses in Developing Countries
FRACKING: The Shale Revolution - "Frackademia" by Law: Section 999 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Exposed - (Poisoning the Ground Water)
Excerpt from above link:
"Frackademia" is best defined as flawed but seemingly legitimate science and economic studies on the controversial oil and gas horizontal drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"), but done with industry funding and/or industry-tied academics ("frackademics").
While the "frackademia" phenomenon has received much media coverage, a critical piece missing from the discussion is the role played by Section 999 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Although merely ten pages out of the massive 551-page bill, Section 999 created the U.S. Department of Energy-run Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America (RPSEA), a "non-profit corporation formed by a consortium of premier U.S. energy research universities, industry and independent research organizations."
Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, RPSEA receives $1 billion of funding - $100 million per year - between 2007 and 2016. On top of that, Section 999 creates an "Oil and Gas Lease Income" fund "from any Federal royalties, rents, and bonuses derived from Federal onshore and offshore oil and gas leases." The federal government put $50 million in the latter pot to get the ball rolling.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005's "Halliburton Loophole" - which created an enforcement exemption from the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act for fracking, and made the chemicals found within fracking fluid a "trade secret" - is by far the bill's most notorious legacy for close followers of fracking.
These provisions were helped along by then-Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Policy Task Force, which entailed countless meetings between Big Oil lobbyists and executives and members of President George W. Bush's cabinet. Together, these lobbyists and appointees hammered out the details behind closed doors of what became the Energy Policy Act of 2005, a bill receiving a "yes" vote by then-U.S. Sen. Barack Obama.
Meanwhile, almost no focus - comparatively speaking - has gone into scrutinizing Section 999, which subsidizes biased pro-industry studies for a decade and in turn, further legitimizes unfettered fracking nationwide.
Speaking at an industry public relations conference in Houston, TX in 2011 - the same conference in which it was revealed the shale gas industry is using psychological warfare tactics on U.S. citizens and recommending the military's “Counterinsurgency Field Manual” for "dealing with an insurgency" of Americans concerned about fracking - S. Dennis Holbrook of Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York stated that it's crucial for industry to "seek out academic studies and champion with universities—because that again provides tremendous credibility to the overall process."
Section 999: In Service to Big Oil
RPSEA's "FAQ" section makes its raison d'être crystal clear.
"The objective of RPSEA is to leverage research dollars along with the technical expertise and experience of RPSEA Members to conduct industry led research and development work to help commercialize domestic...Unconventional Onshore Hydrocarbon Resources," RPSEA's website explains. "RPSEA will focus on innovative technologies to reduce the costs of production, expand and extend the nation's hydrocarbon resource base..."
Membership in RPSEA costs between $1,000-$10,000 per year depending on the company size or if the member has non-profit tax status. Industry dues-paying members include ExxonMobil, Chesapeake Energy, Halliburton, BP, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, GE Oil and Gas, Encana, Statoil, Total, Cabot, BG Group, Devon, Anadarko and many others.
22 universities also pay RPSEA membership dues. They include University of Utah, University of Texas-Austin (a well-known "frackademia" hub), Ohio State University (another well-known "frackademia" hub), Colorado School of Mines, Louisiana State University, Oklahoma State University, Stanford University, West Virginia State University, Colorado State University and many others.
RPSEA's Board of Directors - whose members serve two-year terms - has representatives from the oil and gas industry consisting of GE Oil and Gas, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, Baker Hughes, Western Energy Alliance, Petrobas and Total. Its Unconventional Resources Program Advisory Committee features representatives from Devon Energy, Chesapeake Energy, BP, Southwestern Energy, Schlumberger and Baker Hughes.
Section 999 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 says the Secretary of Energy "shall carry out the activities under Section 999 to maximize the value of natural gas and other petroleum resources of the United States by increasing the supply of such resources."
Some politicians have also found a way to enrich themselves, as well, via shrewd "shalesmanship." Exhibit A: U.S. Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX).
"Since 2010, Hall has earned as much as $1 million from a company that holds mineral rights along the Barnett Shale," explained the Sunlight Foundation in a March 2013 article. "The money was disclosed as dividends from a company called North & East Trading Co. (N&E)."
A September 2008 opinion piece written by Hall explains that he helped write Section 999, meaning he's now pulling a personal profit from the same legislation he helped to author.
"This year marks the culmination of a legislative project I spearheaded in the House, creating an R&D program to recover oil and natural gas from ultra-deepwater and other onshore terrains," he wrote. "This program was included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and is being carried out through the Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America (RPSEA)."
The mission statement laid out in Section 999 doesn't allow for the dangers of fracking - ranging from groundwater contamination, to air contamination, towastewater injection-caused earthquakes, to gas pipeline explosions, to climate change impacts of fracking - to be studied.
WATER RESTRICTIONS: City to enforce new water regulations - reduce water use or fines or water turn-offs
Your Lack of Knowledge is YOUR Consent to these programs that the corporations that run our country are implementing through corporate statutes that are lawless corporate laws . . . read Senate Report 93-549, the Clearfield Doctrine and understand how government really works watch the YouTube "Who is Running America and the CAP" . . go to www.StopTheCrime.net go the the WATER WARS link and read the "documents" that WILL tell you about the Plans to TAKE OVER America's public water system and place the water system into private corporate control . . . CRITICAL READ
Excerpt from above Link:
“We don’t run around fining people; that’s not how you get compliance,” St. John said. “You get compliance by educating people and making sure they’re aware of what the regulations are, why they exist and what opportunities we can provide to help them save a little money on their water bill and save a little water. That’s always our focus.”
To avoid wasting water and accruing fines, residents like Suzanne Clarke are implementing measures like planting drought resistant vegetation and mulching lawns, the latter of which Clarke did through a rebate program of the Sonoma Marin Water Saving Partnership. St. John said such partnerships are important in supporting communities and providing a consistent message — record low rainfall means every drop counts.
WATER a Corporate DOCUMENT - "Statutory Water Rights Law" and Related Water Code Sections (as amended, including Statutes of 2013)
BREAKING: Lawmakers Pass First California Groundwater Rules
"The bill targets areas where groundwater basins are in danger of being over-drafted, or drawn from more quickly than water is replenished. It gives local land planners two years to create a groundwater sustainability agency, which in turn has up to five years to develop a plan for managing wells and pumping. Those plans can include installing meters and charging fees to curb excessive use.
The state Water Resources Control Board would step in and develop plans for communities that don't abide by these rules."
Note: Keep in mind the drought has been deliberately created by weather modification programs . . aka Geoengineering . . WHY? This is a push to bring the public water control into "private" hands of the corporations for profit . . There are global plans that TELL us this. . Simply research Global Water Intelligence, Veolia which is Rothschild water control and even Goldman Sachs is in the water business - stealing the water from all of us . . Also, go to www.ToxicSky.org WHATEVER, you do get this information out . . .
DROUGHT: Scientists Warn CA Drought Could Last 35 Years . . . Corporate Hype and Media Psyops . . to force enforcement statutes for asset stripping.
Excerpt from Above Link:
The study by Cornell, University of Arizona and U.S. Geological Survey researchers will be published in a forthcoming issue of the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate.
‘For the southwestern U.S., I’m not optimistic about avoiding real megadroughts,’ said Toby Ault, Cornell assistant professor of earth and atmospheric sciences and lead author of the paper.
‘As we add greenhouse gases into the atmosphere – and we haven’t put the brakes on stopping this – we are weighting the dice for megadrought.’
As of Aug. 12, most of California sits in a D4 ‘exceptional drought,’ which is in the most severe category. Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas loiter in a substantially less severe D1 moderate drought.
Ault says climatologists don’t know whether the severe western and southwestern drought will continue, but ‘with ongoing climate change, this is a glimpse of things to come.
The NEW GREEN ECONOMY GOIN BROWN: WATER WARS Deliberately Engineered - Santa Cruz Water Violators . . . News Article and Comment
Now, in drought stricken California the weather weapons have been used to create the drought. The power structure aka d'facto corporate government really believes they can continue to trick people into believing there are NO such weather manipulation programs . . The general public remains willfully ignorant and brainwashed . . We see the increased progress of mind-control to manipulate, tame and control the masses. . . The bankers aka criminal crime families are making HUGH profits while poisoning all levels of consumer products and economically gutting country after country . . . "The general rule is that there is a profit in confusion; the more confusion, the more profits. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer solutions" - this is a quote out of Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars . . . free download from www.StopTheCrime.net
Now the new drought saying, here, in Sonoma County in Northern California is "Brown is the New Green". . . Right now Sonoma County is in a declared Stage Two drought , and has a Cash for Grass Program, wherein, water rate payers will pay 50 cents per square foot for lawn that is removed up to $1,000.00. Just think if the state declares a Stage Three drought we will be prohibited from watering ANY lawns at anytime, day or night, PERIOD. Further, we will be prohibited from planting new annual plants, vegetables, flowers or vines. . .
Groundwater mining is "exploitation" of shared resource - Editorials - The Sacramento Bee
EXCERPT from the above link:
Groundwater rules are different. Its use is essentially unregulated, except in a few urban counties. Virtually every rural county considers groundwater the property of the person with the pump. If that pump sucks water away from neighboring wells, well, that’s unfortunate.
The problem with this case of groundwater mining is who profits from it. If Del Puerto were buying surface water from an irrigation district, the money would go to the district and benefit all its members. But private groundwater sales benefit only the seller.
That’s why farmers – generally conservative and often downright disdainful of government regulations – might soon welcome state intervention. The Legislature soon will consider bills for establishing state guidelines if not rules. Besides, they might not have a choice.
A recent case in Siskiyou County, if it survives appeal, could change the groundwater legal landscape. After overpumping lowered the Scott River, a Superior Court judge ruled that groundwater feeding the river belonged to the public and not solely to those who owned the pumps. It’s entirely likely similar challenges are being prepared to protect the Merced, Tuolumne and Stanislaus rivers.
In times of scarcity, water needs to be shared, not exploited.
RAND Corporation - Identifying and Reducing Climate-Change Vulnerabilities in Water-Management Plans
The REAL CAUSE of climate change is the admitted large scale global manipulation from the geoengineering (weather modification) programs that have intentionally caused climate change . . .
Those supporting the need to reduce GHG greenhouse emissions have been conned by the RAND Delphi Technique . . The science RAND is pushing is consensus based which is not REAL science . . . this is mind control to change the FACTS . . For those that support the man-made global warming scenario which tells us there is over population the solution is to reduce the population = GENOCIDE . .
When agencies draft their water- management plans, they commonly assume that their region�s future climate and all its variability will be similar to that experienced over the past several decades. Unfortunately, this planning assump- tion seems increasingly unlikely to hold in the future. In California, according to scientific information compiled by the University of California, climate change will likely lead to higher temperatures, altered precipitation pat- terns, and less snow pack to supply state and federal water projects. Climate change may
This rapidly changing, difficult-to-predict environment poses a major challenge for many water-management agencies.
New Approach to Climate-Change Vulnerability Assessment and Options Analysis
Waterless World - Weather Warfare and Psywar - No Water, No Food, DEATH to the Planet . . . ALL WARS are Bankers WARS - this is WATER Warfare . .
Nestle, Arrowhead tapping water from Morongo reservation
The Water Resources Group Background, Impact and the Way Forward PDF and more . . .