State Bar of California – Compliant of Criminal NON-Action: Public Trust Violated 

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/california-bar-complaint.pdf

EXCERPT:

December 12, 2007 Contact:
+1 (212) 372-4803 direct
+1 (212) 767-9331 mobile
+1 (800) 886-9861 facsimile
jag@jongoodwin.com email
Mr. Scott J. Drexel, Chief Trial Counsel
Ms. Lisa Stowe, Complaint Analyst
Audit and Review Office of the Chief Trial Counsel
The State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles, California 90015-2299
In Re: Inquiry Number: 07-23109
Respondent: Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Miles Frederick Ehrlich; California
Bar Number 237954.
Dear Mr. Drexel and Ms. Stowe:
I received your response to my complaint regarding former Assistant United States
Attorney Miles Frederick Ehrlich who resigned his position with the Department of
Justice (hereinafter referred to as the “DOJ”) sometime during the Fall of 2005.
You state your response is predicated on the fact that Mr. Ehrlich didn’t represent me and
therefore there is no conflict of interest. That’s not at all dispositive of the issues I
evidenced to the State Bar of California. And given the acts underlying the complaint,
committed by Miles Ehrlich, his client(s) and their cohorts, are criminal in nature, very
disturbing.
I hereby request that the Audit and Review Office of the Chief Trial Counsel of the State
Bar of California review my July 31, 2007 complaint in light of the further information
and analysis provided herein.
* * * * *
The Office of the Chief Trial Counsel needs to look at this case from a pedestrian
perspective. Herewith is a synopsis of the facts:
1. A crime victim and witness reports the identities and criminal activities (including
narcotics trafficking, money laundering, fraud, bribing foreign judicial officials
and conspiracy) to a federal prosecutor.
2. The federal prosecutor apparently did not act on the victim’s report.
3. Six months after the victim’s report the federal prosecutor resigned from the
Department of Justice.
4. Thereafter, the victim discovers, coincidentally, that the former federal prosecutor
is representing, as a criminal defense attorney, one of the parties the victim
identified to the former federal prosecutor as engaged in the criminal activity and
is providing advice and counsel to at least one of several of the other perpetrators.